Week Five Results
First number is overall strokes
Second number is - your drop week

A Flight
253 195 Cook/Renaud 51 58 51 46 47
256 202 Dean/Stephens 52 51 54 48 51
269 214 Anderson/Flinn 55 52 52 54 56
284 227 Peaslee/Wiggins 56 56 57 57 58
390 300 Main/Marting 63 57 90 90 90

B Flight
304 239 McFarland/Sells/Stoll 64 58 65 59 58
305 237 Kickbusch/Koenig 62 57 59 68 59
305 240 Adair/Reinks 63 58 62 65 57
351 261 Steve Underwood/Mary Jo Underwood 70 67 90 61 63
354 264 Ana Underwood/Zach Underwood 68 64 90 68 64
381 291 Reed/Witt 68 65 68 90 90

Five weeks down, three to go.

Kids weekly results:
Anna 28
Elizabeth 30
Alex 35

Any suggestion for tees next week? All things independent, I kinda liked not needed to haul my butt up and down that levee in the scorching heat to play 7 long. It's a fun shot from up there, though. I'm open to suggestion.

Lets keep it at the short tee on #7, I liked having an opportunity for an Ace, especially after my last tee shot from there. We can keep the long tee for Renaud/Cook though. I wouldn't mind the long tee again on #5. Is there any way to legthen the tee on #9?

I liked 3 where it was...even though it has been a long time since I threw a decent tee shot there. I'm all for lengthening the course next week, and maybe going with a shorter course the week after and finishing with a course similar to the one we played this week on the last week of the season.

3? We can legthen 3? Are you talking about the same tee?

No--same distance, just teeing off on the right side of the pole instead of the left where we had been, It totally changes that shot.

"Can we lengthen 3?" We can do anything we want! OK not anything, but I have the flags and the paint and that gives us quite a few possibilities. Really # 1 and # 2 can only go back so far because of the building, but all the rest of the tees can be moved back.

The problem I have with the # 3 tee is that it slopes, and it's worse on the right side of the pole than on the left. Yesterday I just put the flag back pretty far on the tee before it really sloped down, and that seemed to be OK. For some reason the slope on both the short and long tee on # 3 bother me. The # 1 short tee bugs me as well. I'm not sure why that is since it's not like the other tees are perfectly flat

Yeah, the tee boxes are getting more and more worn down, and are losing their flatness...were they ever going to put concrete in? I like the idea of changing the tee on #3, but i have a perfect line of flight on that hole.

This is going to hit the character limit, so it will probably spill over to another post...

I think if the people at the parks department could do what they wanted there would be upgrades to the course, but the City Council in Rolla has a long history of not spending money on things that don't make money. I think the future of tee signs and concrete tees at Ber Juan is dependent on good turnouts for leagues and tournaments plus a healthy amount of disc sales so that the parks department can go to the City Council and show them that the course is generating a profit.

The course as it is really wasn't funded by the City. The baskets were purchased through a Fit Phelps grant and Todd did most of the work getting the pin placements in. At this point the City really has very little invested in disc golf. If we had waited for the City Council to approve spending money on a course, there would never have been a Ber Juan course.