Originally Posted by iacas
I'll search and read, but I'm coming from golf and we wouldn't have a 480-yard par three. That's all I'm saying. I'll read and I'm sure I'll learn a bit, though, thanks.
I didn't really mean to sound as snarky as that may read; all I'm saying is that there is major contention is disc golf with regards to par- it's not as clearly defined and hard fast as it is in golf. Courses have evolved, but in many cases the mindsets and opinions on par haven't.
I'm in agreeance with you, for what it's worth, if I had designed this hole it would be a par 4.