Originally Posted by Cgkdisc
Your response to my proposal simply brings up changes in what will need to be monitored but not reasons the option isn't viable.
Not "simply". It looks to me like it brings up more things that are harder to monitor than the simple thing which is being "fixed". Just because the option's viable doesn't mean it's an improvement.
I've yet to see a proposal for fixing the problem of jump-putts that isn't worse than the problem. Come to think of it, I haven't seen the problem of jump-putts described in a way that compels fixing.