View Single Post
  #47  
Old 05-01-2013, 10:22 AM
1978 1978 is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, Nc
Years Playing: 6.3
Courses Played: 185
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeverett View Post
Just to add a little to the above, here's the 'compression' formula that would apply:

For SSA's below 50.3289725:
rating_points_per_throw = -0.487095 * SSA + 34.5734

So, if the SSA after field A plays is determined to be 50, the rating_points_per_throw increment would be 10.21865. So a 52 would be rated at 979.5627 (rounded to 980). So your field B would be vastly more likely to average ~55 than 52. (actually 54.89301424356).
Can you explain the 2 tournaments played 2 weeks apart, same exact layout and conditions, basically. Am vs pro

Azalea Am
R1-R4 Score of 60
Average player rating 895, average propigator rating 904
977 980 974 982 (average for a 60, 978)

Azalea Open
R1-R4 Score of 60
Average player rating 963, average propigator rating 963
989 988 994 993 (average for a 60, 991) (13 pts higher)

How is this not mostly because of the higher rated players in the open tournament padding the ratings of the rounds.
Reply With Quote