#71  
Old 09-16-2011, 09:02 AM
thrembo's Avatar
thrembo thrembo is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Port Charlotte, Fl
Years Playing: 38.9
Courses Played: 79
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 2,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidSauls View Post
Didn't mean to offend. Your post distinguished between "Pros" and "Rec/Ams". I was wondering what "Rec/Ams" meant---is that all recreational and amateur players? Or just players in the Recreational division (one of the amateur divisions). The former includes 970-rated Advanced players; the latter leaves out a huge portion of the disc golf population.

If the former, you're stating your opinion that holes shouldn't be over 500' for all amateur players. Not just what you like. And you didn't qualify it as "long, boring holes over 500'", as opposed to cool, challenging holes over 500'.

It's valid to say YOU don't like holes over 500', regardless of design. If your opinion is that no holes for amateurs, even Advanced Ams, should be over 500', well, it's still your opinion, but I'd argue that since many of the subject players like such holes, it shouldn't be so absolute.

I believe that courses should cater to all skill levels. I understand the need for longer holes, for the pro and advanced players, and those of lesser skill levels who want to torture/challenge themselves. This can usually be achieved by having multiple sets of tee pads, alt pin placements, and by designing courses for different skill levels. I myself prefer shorter technical courses.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-16-2011, 10:23 AM
DavidSauls's Avatar
DavidSauls DavidSauls is online now
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newberry, SC
Years Playing: 18.8
Courses Played: 114
Posts: 6,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrembo View Post
I believe that courses should cater to all skill levels. I understand the need for longer holes, for the pro and advanced players, and those of lesser skill levels who want to torture/challenge themselves. This can usually be achieved by having multiple sets of tee pads, alt pin placements, and by designing courses for different skill levels. I myself prefer shorter technical courses.
Stated that way, I agree completely.
Reply With Quote
 
  

  #73  
Old 09-16-2011, 01:10 PM
Karl Karl is offline
Birdie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 450
Too lazy to read the whole thread, but...

IF POSSIBLE, every course should have 1 of "everything" (that's possible). This includes a hole which will "help separate scores" of the big arms from the less than big arms (just as there should be 1 hole which "helps separate" tight-challenged throwers from those who salivate at tunnel shots, etc.

Karl
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.