
|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | Social Groups |
| - View All Groups | ||
| - Your Group Messages | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Poor Adam_Valk gave Flip City a less than 5 review
Just because Adam only gave a 4.5 out of 5 total for Flip City; he's getting the severe thumbs down treatment. Only thing he said was that there is no water there. I personally, have only given one 5 rating so far; and part of the reason is because water IS IN PLAY on nearly half the holes of a 24 hole layout. Now, I have yet to play Flip City; though, I am hoping to remedy this in 2010...hopefully by meeting a bunch of my fellow DGCR members at a big get together. But, if one is considering a 5 to be perfect....wouldn't water shots have to be included? Thoughts???
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I gave him a thumbs down because the review was not helpfull, not because I disagreed with the content of the review.
__________________
2011 Junior under 19 DG World Champ Discs: http://www.dgcoursereview.com/forums...16#post1368516 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm, at first I felt inclined to agree with you but I don't think a course should be knocked for lacking a certain environmental feature. I don't think water should be a requirement of the 5 disc ideal, but what water represents, a hazard where you are sure to lose discs, should be. It just seems preposterous to think that courses in the deserts and other regions couldn't be 5s b/c they lack water hazards.
__________________
Distance= PD|SOLF|Saint FW= Banshee|Eagle|Leo|Trak Mids= Pain|Tangent|Fuse Putters= Ion|Polecat|Summit BE NICE TO n00bs! |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
If ball golfers were rating the best of their best; the ones that would be chosen; would certainly have serious water features. True???
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have to disagree about water being required for giving a 5 rating.
Water is one item that if it is not there already, it's not going to be put in for a disc golf course. The same thing could be said for hills and valleys. Course design and upkeep makes a 5 rating. Water is not required, but it makes course designs so much better.
__________________
DGCR #2005 2009 Travel Tag #13 ![]() 2010 Travel Tag #32 2011 Travel Tag #20 CCDG BagTag #51 Bad Ace Series BagTag #25 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think water HAS to be present for a 5 on a course, it depends on the person. I know people who HATE water and will skip those holes, and i know some people who love water holes. If a course has some awesome elevation, shot selection, good tees/sighns/baskets, its fun...etc it can still get a 5. Im sure some peopleow uld rate down for water, because they are afraid to loose some discs.
__________________
If you ask enough people, you can usually find someone who will advise you to do what you were going to do anyway. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is going on here? Why do I keep seeing all these thread about "well I disagree with so and so's review don't you guys agree with me"?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like the fact that he mentioned the lack of water, but that one point doesn't make it a good review.
Now if it had been a detailed review that covered multiple points of the course and then gave it a 4.5 and got marked down - then I would have an issue. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well Frank, some people just like to stir the (poop)
__________________
"Yesterday I played Frisbee Golf, err, Golf Frisbee, err, whatever it's called when you throw your 9 iron into the woods." - Tim Hawkins |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm just saying these threads seem like thinly veiled cries for validation.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM.

















