#1  
Old 12-11-2015, 09:55 AM
DinosaurThunder's Avatar
DinosaurThunder DinosaurThunder is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Brooklyn Park, MN
Years Playing: 22.7
Courses Played: 3
Throwing Style: LHBH
Posts: 693
Default PDX

Maskedavenger made the discovery in the recent approved disc PDF. (shout out!)

http://www.pdga.com/files/pdga_appro...scs_120915.pdf

Looks slightly faster than a PD, could this be the OS disc people have been craving? Or like Masked speculated, a disc with lots of turn?
Sponsored Links
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2015, 10:59 AM
tbird888's Avatar
tbird888 tbird888 is offline
Salient Disc Test Team
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Cincinnati
Years Playing: 11
Courses Played: 135
Throwing Style: LHFH
Posts: 12,535
Default

So all my CFR PDs could become valueless? I can throw them without worry now!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:15 AM
Horsman's Avatar
Horsman Horsman is offline
Pandamonium Discs
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Years Playing: 9.7
Courses Played: 100
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,450
Default

Maybe a One Speed faster PD
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:15 AM
bobmcnelly's Avatar
bobmcnelly bobmcnelly is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Steamboat Springs, Co
Years Playing: 4.8
Courses Played: 94
Throwing Style: LHBH
Posts: 1,799
Default

So it's a more OS PD2?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:18 AM
halfchub halfchub is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 142
Default

(pdx vs pd) 1.9 rim vs 2.1 rim. 1.9 vs 1.7 height.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:20 AM
halfchub halfchub is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 142
Default

So middle between pd and pd2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:23 AM
titovanburen titovanburen is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: kansas
Years Playing: 6.7
Courses Played: 58
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 243
Default

hmmm
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:25 AM
titovanburen titovanburen is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: kansas
Years Playing: 6.7
Courses Played: 58
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by halfchub View Post
(pdx vs pd) 1.9 rim vs 2.1 rim. 1.9 vs 1.7 height.
You mixed this up I think
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:27 AM
halfchub halfchub is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 142
Default

I did. Ooopppss

Corrected version

(pdx vs pd) 2.1 vs 1.9. 1.9 vs 1.7 height.
Reply With Quote
 

  #10  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:30 AM
titovanburen titovanburen is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: kansas
Years Playing: 6.7
Courses Played: 58
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 243
Default

sounds like it will make for a sweet disc!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.