
|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | Social Groups |
| - View All Groups | ||
| - Your Group Messages | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
To the original post, I haven't gone through and looked systematically, but I have seen trends in some places. In Michigan and Wisconsin I remember playing several courses where I thought they underestimated how wooded it was. Texas, Nevada and California overrated how wooded, and Texas and Nevada overrated how hilly.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I do not think for 1 minute that my "research" puts this to bed, but I am not inclined to think there are major systemic issues.....but I do think there are errors/misunderstandings that almost all areas have - some areas slightly more than others. That said, I have not played much at all in the more sparsely forested and dry areas of the country (desert/ish & Rocky Mtn areas). I am talking about TX, AZ, CA, NV, CO, NM, UT, MT?, ID. The very small number of course I played in CA and TX seemed set up about right. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, so if I was to expand on the 3 categories:
Flat - Mostly Flat - Moderately Hilly - Very Hilly - Extremely Hilly Open - Lightly Wooded - Evenly Wooded - Moderately Wooded - Heavily Wooded Thoughts? |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Evenly Wooded just sounds weird as a description title, sounds more like the whole course is in the woods still. Wouldn't Open/Wooded Mix, or Evenly Mixed be a little better?
What would define Very Hilly vs Extremely Hilly? Total elevation change?
__________________
GET HYZER |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think "evenly wooded" is an ambiguous term. I also see that "moderately" is the middle choice in hilliness and the second heaviest in woodiness. That could lead to confusion, so I'd suggest replacing "evenly wooded" with "moderately wooded" and choosing another term for the second highest woodiness. Maybe "mostly wooded"?
__________________
Don't believe everything you think. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Follow up question: elevation change is fairly easy to quantify, but do you just measure the net difference between tee and basket or do you take the deep valley between them into account?
__________________
Don't believe everything you think. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you are talking about one hole, where I'm talking about the whole course from the lowest point to the highest point. But yeah the valley would be included if that valley was the lowest part of the course.
__________________
GET HYZER Last edited by sidewinder22; 02-01-2013 at 12:06 PM. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm sure this will be widely debated.......but for "hilly" measurements I would suggest having a range of how many holes on the course have an increase or decrease of 10' vs 5' vs 20+ft.......This would be a lot of work, but I think elevation change on a tee sign should be the norm (although I know there are few courses out there that follow this practice). Anyways just some thoughts, but I again having clear definitions will help clear up the bias IMO |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just added extremely hilly to even up the choices. As for evenly wooded, yea, I wasn't too crazy about it either. I'll have to give it some more thought. New013 had a pretty good definition for the wooded stuff IMO.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Add some guidance on courses that mix two styles. I can think of several in which the front 9 is Lightly Wooded, the back 9 moderately, even heavily wooded. I can think of at least 2 which have big differences in hilliness between the front 9 & back 9. I'm never sure how to characterize these.
__________________
Visit us at Stoney Hill Disc Golf Course |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.















