#1111  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:33 PM
MrGlass01's Avatar
MrGlass01 MrGlass01 is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Glarus, WI
Posts: 3,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by juju View Post
Uh, it is the original wasp tooled mold. The only thing that changed was the core piece of the mold. Top and wing are correct. See my comment regarding the backwards C imperfection earlier in this thread. They are legit.
Not saying I doubt you but the wasp tooling is lame.
Reply With Quote
  #1112  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:34 PM
BirdmanCR's Avatar
BirdmanCR BirdmanCR is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: charlotte
Years Playing: 2.2
Courses Played: 29
Posts: 1,761
Its not the same mold take a micrometer and measure a 10/10 buzzz and measure a 10th anny.
Reply With Quote
  #1113  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:35 PM
loki993 loki993 is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Holly, Mi
Courses Played: 8
Posts: 817
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirdmanCR View Post
Its lager in diameter than any of the buzzes currently made. read the specs.
Where are the specs?
Reply With Quote
  #1114  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:36 PM
BirdmanCR's Avatar
BirdmanCR BirdmanCR is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: charlotte
Years Playing: 2.2
Courses Played: 29
Posts: 1,761
Unno buddie showed me than I took my micrometer and measured myself.
Reply With Quote
  #1115  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:39 PM
BirdmanCR's Avatar
BirdmanCR BirdmanCR is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: charlotte
Years Playing: 2.2
Courses Played: 29
Posts: 1,761
The flight plate was 2.62 mm higher. .2 mm wider.
Reply With Quote
  #1116  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:56 PM
Future_Primitive's Avatar
Future_Primitive Future_Primitive is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Meeeechigan
Courses Played: 55
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirdmanCR View Post
The flight plate was 2.62 mm higher. .2 mm wider.
.2mm is nothing, .00787", like a piece of paper. Surely a 10 year old disc is going to shrink over time no?

Comparing it to one fresh of the line and only being .2mm difference is being pretty nit-picky about it. Heck you can .2mm variance if you buy any two of the same disc right now.
Reply With Quote
  #1117  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:57 PM
juju's Avatar
juju juju is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota
Years Playing: 17.4
Courses Played: 58
Throwing Style: LHBH
Posts: 1,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirdmanCR View Post
Its lager in diameter than any of the buzzes currently made. read the specs.
So you're not even measuring it against the original wasp tooled mold?
Reply With Quote
  #1118  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:58 PM
BirdmanCR's Avatar
BirdmanCR BirdmanCR is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: charlotte
Years Playing: 2.2
Courses Played: 29
Posts: 1,761
Both discs I measured where BRAND NEW. I measured 2 brand new "old school" or "real" buzzzs and ALL of the 5 10th annys I have. NO the .2mm diameter difference isn't that big but 2+mm on the flight plate IS. And I was just saying that ive measured and confirmed its ISNT the original mold with a tooling change its a complete change of the og mold.
Reply With Quote
  #1119  
Old 03-15-2013, 01:59 PM
BirdmanCR's Avatar
BirdmanCR BirdmanCR is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: charlotte
Years Playing: 2.2
Courses Played: 29
Posts: 1,761
the current production buzzes measure the same as wasp tooled buzzes and buzz tooled buzzzs from back in the day. There may be molded in a harder plastic but the mold on the current "buzz tooled" buzzzs are the same. IF you don't believe me feel free to measure its all there for someone to find out.
Reply With Quote
 

  #1120  
Old 03-15-2013, 05:38 PM
Jkosk's Avatar
Jkosk Jkosk is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Minnesota
Years Playing: 8.3
Courses Played: 15
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 616
I am curious, why are you trying so hard to discredit the 10th anniversary buzzzes by claiming they do not use the existing mold? Because the WASP tooling is different and you feel wronged? What do you have to gain by going so far out of your way to call them "junk"?

And those differences you measured are fairly minuscule and could be attributed to a number of different things, including how this blend molded up and cooled.

Also, are you claiming that every old barstamp and current circle stamp buzzz that you measured had identical dimensions? I find that incredibly hard to believe with the quality control found in this industry...

I just don't see any reason discraft would have to change the top or wing of the mold for the 10th anniversary edition.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.