Suttons Bay, MI 
Herman Park Share
Uploaded By: DaKineSurfer32 Hole #9 (Taken 11/2012)
5 / 540ft. Par / Distance:
Hole #9 Tee Sign

Reviews: 5
Avg. Rating:
Clear FiltersFilter/Sort
Reviews between: and Sort By:
Exp. (in years): Played: Reviewed: Only Trusted Reviewers
 Decent, but could benefit from minor changes

1    7/16/2015   7/20/2015
Review By: m_Krakov
Played: 16  Reviewed: 1  Exp: 15.2 Years
1 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: As another reviewer said, it is nice to have a course up there for play on vacation, but its mere presence does not merit high marks. A number of long holes add fun factor as you are able to throw some bombs. I'm sure if it wasn't so windy when I played that I would have enjoyed these open holes much more.
Cherry orchard section was nice, but grass was TALL and the landing areas were quite small.
Flow ( read: not hole layout) was generally good until about hole 15.
Cons: Layout is problematic, and it was (in my experience) made more confusing due to tee maps that were not accurate in terms of scale and distance to obstacles. As a course likely played by many people visiting the area, it could be made more enjoyable/playable for novice/intermediate level players with a revision of course mapping. Again, as was noted by another reviewer, the last 3-4 holes are generally unplayable. Fairways through the wooded holes are 4-5 feet wide through heavy, bug-infested undergrowth. Combine this with blind shots that dogleg back on themselves, and you will likely spend time searching for discs. Novices will NOT enjoy this course, as there are ample opportunities to lose a disc on practically every hole be it into water, woods, tall grass, or massive brush piles.
Other Thoughts: Bugs, bugs, bugs...

It seems the course designers tried to work w limited space, but the difficulty of wooded holes seem gimmicky in that you were forced into throwing lines that I'd wager a large percentage of disc golfers can not/do not throw, with extremely limited margin for error.

Bottom line: Go to the beach instead.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.


1    7/9/2013   7/9/2013
Review By: apdrvya
Played: 262  Reviewed: 256  Exp: 5.6 Years
3 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: Aesthetic--park seems to be newish with a lot of expansion planned for the future. For now there isn't much there besides disc golf. When we got there a family was flying an rc airplane.

Baskets--discraft, brand new shiny baskets.

Routing and navigation-- not too bad, pretty intuitive where to go except for 15 to 16.

Signage--great, except for the distances on a few holes (16?) Seemed way off.

Design--7,11&12 were great holes. 7 is a water shot with trees guarding the pin, 11&12 play through an old orchard.

Risk v reward--for all the things this course lacks, risk v reward is certainly not one of them. Plenty of risk to be had withthe water holes and the impossible rough through the woods.
Cons: Design-- lazy lazy lazy in a lot of places. 1,2,9,10 have to be some of the laziest hole designs ever. 1 plays across the entrance road to the park, 2 plays along the parking lot, then a sharp left and 250+ into the woods. 9&10 are huge bomber holes across a field where fairways and throws could certainly cross...

Teepads--the rectangle ones are nice. The two awkward circle ones on 9&10 are annoying as we are not throwing discus or shot put. The woods holes all had dirt (mud) pads.

Wetness--the woods holes were all very narrow with little chance to recover an errant shot off fairway, very wet playing across marahes. It is possible that wood chips are on the way in though.

Danger--when some of the other ammenities are in, this course could be very dangerous with proximity issues.
Other Thoughts: This was a good attempt but falls short of awesomeness, a few holes were cool, but the lazy and woods holes sort of ruined it for me. If you're in the area though, hit it up!

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.

Join Disc Golf Course Review for free to add your review. Have an account already? Sign In to add a review.