Pros:
The course now is 18 holes versus the original 9, and the two sections have their own, distinct flavor.
All but one tee is made of concrete or pavers. I think only hole 14 has pavers. Rest are short-height concrete, which means when you come off the front in the action of throwing that you don't kill yourself tripping off the pad. No. 4's long tee is a marking on the walking path; its short tee is concrete.
I appreciate that there's real thought in all of the holes. The design of the fairways consider the flight of the best disc to throw. If you indeed choose the right disc for the situation and throw it somewhere near accurately, you will get what you envisioned.
Two pads and 4 pin positions means there will be a lot of varied looks for this rather small, tight course. It appears (at any given time), both a short (red) and long (white) basket is up. Nos. 9 and 14 also have a third black-banded basket, said in a depression at 14.
Though mostly wooded, the variety is good. Some holes have the basket straight ahead (in some pin positions), but the fairway is full of trees you have to get around (holes 3, 4, 7, 11, 13, 16). Others have you start open and go into a cove (nos. 1, 6) or land on a steep slope (no. 8). Some have a decently clear fairway, but said is narrow (nos. 9, 12, 14) or a downright tight tunnel (nos. 2, 5). Some dog leg (nos. 10, 15, 17). No. 18 has plenty trees but also plenty gaps. I love this variety. Makes the course interesting and balanced. And no two holes of essentially the same design are in succession.
Though not a fan of elevated baskets, I don't mind these here (nos. 4A, 6A, 12A). No. 10 also adds artificial challenge with a mess of large boulders around the short basket.
I am a fan of open or partially-open holes on occasion through a tract, so I appreciate the reprieve the open holes here provided and their placement.
If you need to build or refine your woods play, this is a great course to do it on. The holes are not tremendously long, and if you find a technique that works, there is plenty opportunity to refine it here. I found myself throwing the putter when driving and approaching in the woods until I could get to enough openness to throw something a little bigger (a floaty mid-range or a fairway driver) to shape something other than a straight line.
The straightforward hole signs are perfect. I love how the pins in play on any given day are boldly marked. The information on the signs is comprehensive without being confusing. And the visual map of the hole with flight lines and all possible pin placements is clean and easy to understand. Distance measurements are listed from all tees (junior to long) to both (or all 3) baskets. Nevertheless, you may need to walk down the fairway after your initial throw to find the pin you are playing to because of all of the trees. I also like that the hole signs are placed between short and long tee, which saves the park service and local club money and gives neither tee a preference.
Cons:
Not really a con but an observation. The course may look old to you upon first visit because the park itself is old. I didn't realize it was such a new course because of this. Old building where the restrooms are, old basketball courts, old parking lots, old picnic tables, etc. Said give the entire place a certain decrepit aesthetic, but everything works (it appears) and is maintained. So one just has to get over the 1960s/1970s(?) vibe.
The rough off of the fairway is quite thick in most places and is full of that prickly, thorny stuff so common in the Mid-Atlantic. Try to throw straight!
The walk from hole 9 to hole 10 is a little confusing for the first-timer. If we had a few more directional signs to indicate which way to walk (towards the old building or towards the football/soccer field), that would be great. Of course, once you know this (after your first visit), you don't need it. I sat down at a picnic table and let the group behind me pass ahead. I followed them thereafter.
Other Thoughts:
As indicated, the course and park don't look like much on first view. You may not be impressed with its aesthetics at all, but it is a very well-designed course. It's not just some second-effort neighborhood course with dinky little holes offering zero challenge. To the contrary: Every hole on this course offers a challenge for novice and recreational players if not also intermediate-level and advanced players (maybe so). I truly appreciate that.
Notice that the DGCR map and some of the older pictures are not current. It looks like what was no. 6 is now no. 5 and routed in the opposite direction. New no. 6 has mostly open fairway down a good 350 feet (?) and then tucks back into the woods to the slightly-elevated green. There are signs up to not play no. 6 during school hours (there's a grade school next door). No. 9 is now totally in the woods. Its short red basket is at the end of the wooded fairway. The long white basket is out in a small field along with a third (black-banded, narrow) basket. What used to be a no. 9 basket (in a cove of trees between the east(?) parking lot and the big field) is now the practice basket, I believe (blue-banded).