Mainstream vs Observational


Clearly, mainstream history is filled with innacuracies, yet we see them held on to with vigor. Observational historical information surrounds us... So many things and so many of these in plain sight. Right before us everywhere. Contemporary technologies allow us to find even more objects of interest.

What do you observe?
What do I observe?

I see the faint, built over, eroded, clear markings of an advanced civilization from ancient times. Taking a best guess from various methods, there was a high civilization ~24K years in the past. The technology of this society was based on higher dimensional physics. This is not to say that they were more sophisticated than we are... It was more natural to be aware of the presence and influence of the higher dimension(s). These people had a different combination of physical and subtle body...their subtle body was more defined than what we have while their physical body could be said to be less focused. Their buildings and objects were likely crystalline in nature and could be manipulated in ways that we would struggle to understand...even as basic an idea it was to them. Our physical bodies are very focused in this dimension. Our subtle bodies have atrophic characteristics... Our subtle body is nearly vestigial. This makes it so difficult for us to understand what is in plain sight when we look at it. Our mainstream view of evolution, for example, has no concept for subtle bodies or extra dimenions to work with. This is the blindness that we were born with. We all have a form of blindness...it is the absence of any (or much) information from the subtle sensory organs. We are subtle body blind and stumble around in that space.