![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’ve played for 10 years off and on, and just for fun. I never filmed my throw or even thought about form. It’s funny that you are of the opinion that just playing disc golf for a longer period of time will lead to someone throwing further. If you have bad form, no amount of time will lead to more distance. If anything, you’re building muscle memory that will just be harder and harder to break. I didn’t start trying to figure out correct form until this past April. So for all intents and purposes, you and I have a similar amount of time invested in improving form. I can get my fairway drivers out to 330ish. I’ve thrown faster discs like escapes and valks around 370ish. I’ve had pretty rapid improvement just like you, I couldn’t throw 200 feet when I started in April. I got up to 350ish in about 3 months, but I don’t expect much more distance til I fix some form issues so I’m not even trying to throw far at this point |
Quote:
He has 10 years of bad habits to unlearn after never focusing on form, but IMO he has made some great progress in about 3 months of work... Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
We do have a suitable comparison: you and seedlings are about the same age and have comparable experience. Yet seedlings is throwing over 400 while you are still only imagining having that distance. What accounts for the difference? Seems like your build would give you a mechanical advantage over seedlings, so why aren't you throwing over 400' also? You have basically the same amount of time throwing, so it's not like there is a difference in time spent developing "muscular explosiveness" like you emphasize. Here's one notable difference: One of you is open to coaching from sources with demonstrated success in coaching/throwing, while the other is stubbornly holding onto a theory that is rooted in observations/analysis of a novice (in multiple disciplines), not to mention often conflicts with established principles of physics and biomechanics. You don't know what you don't know, and that is limiting your ability. The knowledge you have gained is blinding you to the knowledge you lack. Again, the Dunning-Kruger effect in action. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm actually advocating to throw like Sidewinder in his video- the part where he actually throws. I am not advocating for some of what he says. Why? Because he says what he thinks he is doing but the video evidence shows something different. Sidewinder actually has pretty good mechanics. If I was to teach someone how to throw I would use the throwing parts of his video where he is actually throwing and not use the parts where he talks about what he thinks he is doing. |
FWIW, any adult who is determined to improve their form via the plethora of videos, diagrams and drills can throw 400’+. I know this because when I throw with all my might it’s just a boring 275’. But when I throw with technique, I am dumbfounded for how little effort it took.
I still retreat to the hard work throws, but the disciplined technique throws are happening more often. The easy throws usually come when I’m thinking about shot placement and completely forget to remind myself all the drills. BUT! I play with guys who don’t work on form. They throw 275’. If their placement is better than mine, the distance is of no use. I can be pin high in the woods, while they are 120’ short of the pin. They par and I bogey. If local courses had 800’ wide open par 5s, I’d kick their butts. As it is, 275’ max distance will get you under par on most courses. I am hoping that disciplined work on form will get me accuracy. That’s really what I want. I don’t need to throw farther. If my drives stayed within a 15 degree wide window instead of a 30 degree wide window, man I’d hit so many fewer trees. It is so disappointing to be able to throw it to the 368’ pin, but hit a tree 50’ from the tee and get out driven... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Players such as yourself and seedlings = apples Players who are casual novices = oranges You are the one comparing apples and oranges. I am saying you need to compare apples to apples. Here is the breakdown as if it were an experiment: Player 1 and Player 2 are both physically capable males between the age of 45-48 with substantially similar experience. Player 1 uses method A. Player 2 uses method B Player 2 achieves superior results to Player 1. Since factors such as age, experience, effort, etc. have been held equal, and the differentiating variable is which method each player used, it follows that method B yields superior results to method A. Yes, you are both above average, which is precisely why comparing the two of you is more appropriate than comparing either of you to other novices. That pool of players has a wide variance in age, experience, time spent throwing, time spent studying form and technique, etc. You and seedlings have more attributes in common, so it is less likely that another variable accounts for the difference in results. In other words, it is easier to isolate the variable that accounts for the difference in results since other variables are substantially equal. "ceteris paribus" if you will. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.