Jacobpaul81 |
10-11-2019 11:15 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mediocrefellow
(Post 3505678)
There's that, which is reason enough I think, and the fact that despite a cult following of loyalists their mid's have been the weakest part of their lineup. Ive personally bagged a few tangents, an axis, vector, and theory and finally settled on proton and electron matrix's to cover all mid shots because I find it to be the most versatile mid they have.
I for one am excited to see what they come up with because their putters and drivers are leading the industry pack in performance IMHO.
|
Interestingly, according to sales data from Infinite, the Axis was selling pretty well for them. Better than the Matrix. Top 3rd of the line-up. Of course, practically every other discontinued mid had low sales. Not surprising, the Envy was outselling everything else at a ridiculous rate... it was outselling the next most popular disc, the Pilot, nearly 3 to 1.
When putters like the Envy or Pilot or Entropy fly 300' consistently, what's a midrange driver actually for? Beginners struggle to throw far and race out and buy drivers. Advanced players may add a midrange at some point - they are still for the most part, driver happy. Pros have the arms to throw putters like mids... Midrange Driver is a challenging sell point I'm sure.
I've personally bagged the Axis, Matrix, Vector, and Deflector - at one point all at the same time. But they slowly but surely got removed from my rig. I have a Matrix, but I don't use it much. Envy / Entropy covers most shots that I'd throw a midrange at - when I do throw it, it's usually for a left to right anhyzer in the trees where I need a little more speed to carry.
Steve did say this week that they will be using the Matrix core for future mids... so that's interesting...
|