^ This young man's got a diamond in his future.

Quality reviews from the perspective of a player who's played several courses in a variety of different states & communities, written with objectivity.

My, isn't mmcfly101 the prolific one?
Judge for yourself...

They still don't want to limit the amount of reviews submitted in one day. As such, we periodically get blasted with a way of 3 sentence reviews like this.

Chances are this guy won't be active on here anymore.

I'm just asking people to vote their conscience, based on the content of each review.

I love seeing one of my reviews roll off of the front page in just a couple of hours...:doh::doh:

I recall last year when dgcr member globetrotter dropped 76 reviews in 5 days.

how long did reviews say up on the main page five years ago?
perhaps an extended list of 15 or 20 should be entertained. I do realize you can hit the "older tab" but how many people other than TRs really do that.

Agreed. Mine is on the fourth page after being posted a little more than 12 hours earlier.

Look at it as a positive: people are taking the time and effort to review courses. Their reviews are no less valuable than yours.

That would be true... if they actually said something in their reviews. As I said earlier... a review is more than a bunch of superlatives. Reviews with no real content, are basically just attempts to influence ratings.

I'm not dismissing their opinions as people... simply saying that they're not providing any substance, hence there's inherently less value.

Bottom line is to find reviewers who share your DG values.

But what if your DG values include hit-and-run no-info course ratings? :popcorn: :|