Monocacy |
05-16-2020 06:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRW III
(Post 3587297)
As a society, we are going to need to find a balance between the economy and safety risk.
|
Agreed
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRW III
(Post 3587297)
To "stay at home" until a vaccine is available for mass distribution would be a worse destruction to our society than to completely open up and let the virus run its course.
|
Fortunately there are options besides “stay at home” and “let the virus run its course.”
The best option, and one that many smaller countries have done very effectively, is to use testing, tracing, and supported isolation to control and suppress the pandemic.
From what I have read, the damage to the economy from shutdowns is far greater than the cost of doing testing, tracing, and isolation properly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRW III
(Post 3587297)
While not everything should open up to full capacity, we are going to need to find the "new normal".
|
Agreed. Currently, most testing is done for symptomatic patients. Asymptomatic people are not being tested, even though research shows that they are responsible for spreading > 50% of infections.
Shockingly, people with known exposures are not being tested unless symptomatic. I know a person who was in contact with someone who tested positive (< 6-feet apart for more than 10 minutes with no mask). The doctor refused write a note authorizing testing unless the person was showing symptoms.
This. Is. Madness.
So I will believe that we are taking this seriously when we have enough tests to identify new infections; enough people trained to do contact tracing; and support for people to stay home when they are sick. That is how other countries have broken the chain of new infections so that they can start opening their economies safely.
Believing that this pandemic will go away without putting in the hard work is indulging in magical thinking.
|