#1  
Old 08-07-2019, 03:57 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 16.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,612
Niced 758 Times in 649 Posts
Default Mach III

https://discgolf.com/wp-content/uplo...ch3-patent.jpg

So in the post above I just found out that Ed Hendrick got the patent for the Mach III on the day I was born. The Mach III was approved by PDGA in March 17 1987 but might not have been made commercially Available until the patent was approved. This means that of 12-2018 the Mach III idea turned 30 years old.

I still think the Mach II was a more revolutionary idea, adding a second set of chains to a basket that made it so baskets could stop modern disc golf discs better then the single chain designed for catch discs. https://discgolf.com/wp-content/uplo...ch2-patent.jpg
Sponsored Links
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2019, 05:44 PM
ThomasOrion's Avatar
ThomasOrion ThomasOrion is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Courses Played: 20
Posts: 3,738
Niced 590 Times in 432 Posts
Default

I'm sorry to hear that - Mach 3's suck the most.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2019, 08:09 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 16.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,612
Niced 758 Times in 649 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasOrion View Post
I'm sorry to hear that - Mach 3's suck the most.
Actually the original Mach II sucks the most If anyone has had the chance to use one but that basket was made for a slower disc era.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2019, 04:04 PM
InDaWoodsDiscN419 InDaWoodsDiscN419 is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Courses Played: 8
Posts: 135
Niced 38 Times in 31 Posts
Default Ed Headrick...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey 1988 View Post
https://discgolf.com/wp-content/uplo...ch3-patent.jpg

So in the post above I just found out that Ed Hendrick got the patent for the Mach III on the day I was born. The Mach III was approved by PDGA in March 17 1987 but might not have been made commercially Available until the patent was approved. This means that of 12-2018 the Mach III idea turned 30 years old.

I still think the Mach II was a more revolutionary idea, adding a second set of chains to a basket that made it so baskets could stop modern disc golf discs better then the single chain designed for catch discs. https://discgolf.com/wp-content/uplo...ch2-patent.jpg
Ed Headrick was a helluva cool dude for inventing baskets and championing Disc Golf!

Look him up on YT, Johnny Carson show.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2019, 05:15 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 16.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,612
Niced 758 Times in 649 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InDaWoodsDiscN419 View Post
Ed Headrick was a helluva cool dude for inventing baskets and championing Disc Golf!

Look him up on YT, Johnny Carson show.
I have seen that Disc golf clip as well as an earlier clip in Tonight show with the Wham-O Superball.

I have played a course he designed in 1980's. It still used the old Mach II not a great basket for modern Discs.

Last edited by Casey 1988; 08-09-2019 at 05:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2019, 01:00 AM
Blobfish's Avatar
Blobfish Blobfish is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Years Playing: 3.4
Courses Played: 18
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 541
Niced 167 Times in 103 Posts
Default

The day I miss a basket because of anything more than my own fault will be the day that I can justify badmouthing a basket. Til then, I like Mach III's just fine. The only spitouts I get when there isn't any wind are almost always a result of me throwing to the weak side of the basket. That's not the basket's fault.
I like the sound on Mach III as well.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2019, 12:53 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 16.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,612
Niced 758 Times in 649 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blobfish View Post
The day I miss a basket because of anything more than my own fault will be the day that I can justify badmouthing a basket. Til then, I like Mach III's just fine. The only spitouts I get when there isn't any wind are almost always a result of me throwing to the weak side of the basket. That's not the basket's fault.
I like the sound on Mach III as well.
The newer Mach III, taller bottom Cage seems to help the disc stay in better. Sometimes with the older size the disc would bounce out thanks to the inner set of chains if putting really hard but now with newer height on the cage the basket is better. I like the basket sound on Mach III too but the Mach V is not bad ether, sounds the way a modern Mach II sounds but fuller.

Only basket I do not like that I have used is a Mach X, I use the pole and pick the edge to aim at as that does not move in wind like the chains do and with a Mach X the pole is hard to see. One hole at a course I have played was fixed with a Mach X top, a tree messed up the old top and I have a harder time putting on those.

Last edited by Casey 1988; 08-14-2019 at 12:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-18-2019, 12:02 PM
InDaWoodsDiscN419 InDaWoodsDiscN419 is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Courses Played: 8
Posts: 135
Niced 38 Times in 31 Posts
Default I'm sure some target courses were/are awesome...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blobfish View Post
The day I miss a basket because of anything more than my own fault will be the day that I can justify badmouthing a basket. Til then, I like Mach III's just fine. The only spitouts I get when there isn't any wind are almost always a result of me throwing to the weak side of the basket. That's not the basket's fault.
I like the sound on Mach III as well.
Baskets elevate the game, the CHING sound ringing in the Woods. I hear enough tree

sounds during the round, don't need to hit another tree (on purpose) to finish my hole.

Tone poles can sound cool too, so I've heard. Mach III's do what they were intended to do,

the rest is up to us.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2019, 12:57 PM
VictorB's Avatar
VictorB VictorB is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Years Playing: 14.2
Courses Played: 91
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,892
Niced 1,110 Times in 562 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasOrion View Post
I'm sorry to hear that - Mach 3's suck the most.
MachIIIs catches fine. Heck, MachI baskets catch fine - if you're able to adjust your putt to match the equipment.

I recall a comparison that the baskets are like greens in golf (I think Brian Earhart can be credited IIRC) Faster, harder greens require more touch. Slower, softer or wet greens require more speed on your putt. Some baskets are like fast greens - can't just blast it in there and expect it to catch. Being able to successfully putt on Mach3 and Mach7/MachX means you have better control of what you're doing with your putter.
Reply With Quote
 

  #10  
Old 09-18-2019, 05:12 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 16.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,612
Niced 758 Times in 649 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorB View Post
MachIIIs catches fine. Heck, MachI baskets catch fine - if you're able to adjust your putt to match the equipment.

I recall a comparison that the baskets are like greens in golf (I think Brian Earhart can be credited IIRC) Faster, harder greens require more touch. Slower, softer or wet greens require more speed on your putt. Some baskets are like fast greens - can't just blast it in there and expect it to catch. Being able to successfully putt on Mach3 and Mach7/MachX means you have better control of what you're doing with your putter.
Bold: Not true for everyone.

I do agree, however some like my brother could slam putt into a Mach III and still have the disc make it in, he was accurate to hit just to the right side of pole that was same side as his throwing hand on the putt. He aimed for the chain set nearest that side so he could slam putt and was using at the time a 2000's flat top DX Gator beat to fly straight. those were the lower disc cage style from 2000's.

I can putt into the 18 chain Lightning DB-5/old 18 chain Innova Discatcher sport just fine. New Discatcher Sport are now 24 with inner set of chains. The only baskets I have true troubles with are the old Chainstar, the bottom disc cage is so low that some putts bounce out of the baskets even on soft touch, even a modern Mach II is taller by a tad.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Portable Base for really old Mach III esdubya Course Maint. & Equipment 11 09-25-2017 09:28 AM
Vintage Mach III sleeve specs Guezo Course Maint. & Equipment 6 12-04-2015 08:00 PM
Survey: DISCatcher or Mach III? TheWolf Other Gear 15 07-27-2014 12:10 PM
Basket for the house, Mach III oorrr....? Gdragon04 General Disc Golf Chat 33 06-22-2014 07:07 PM
Making Mach III sleeves jimbosprint Course Maint. & Equipment 3 01-07-2013 09:10 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.