#1  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:01 PM
ODRB's Avatar
ODRB ODRB is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Years Playing: 11.5
Courses Played: 163
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,463
Niced 1,177 Times in 579 Posts
Default PD v Thunderbird?

Let's have a civil and meaningful discussion about the differences between these two seemingly-identical discs. Let's leave the obviously-inferior Starfire out of it.

http://www.inboundsdiscgolf.com/cont...896321777921OO
Sponsored Links
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:10 PM
ThunderMuffin ThunderMuffin is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Courses Played: 40
Posts: 25
Niced 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Why would you call the Starfire inferior, let alone "obviously" inferior? They're a damn good mold and anyone who has known the market for a decade or more will agree with me.

PD > Starfire I understand the argument. The Thunderbird hasn't even been out for a year.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:16 PM
whentherainscome's Avatar
whentherainscome whentherainscome is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lansing, MI
Years Playing: 12.5
Courses Played: 60
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 2,289
Niced 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I swapped my S-PD for a Champ Thunderbird. Same flight and better grip on the JL plastic blend. PDs are more versatile but only because they've had more runs/plastics to provide the variants needed to cover so much ground. You can throw a Thunderbird in a bag of PDs and not skip a beat.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:19 PM
DGHippie DGHippie is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 113
Niced 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've used both of them as faster alternatives to my eagles. In my experience, PDs are more similar to a longer Eagle X's and Thunderbird are more similar to longer fresh Eagle L's. I beat in my first PD, so it can cover shots where I might have otherwise used a Thunderbird. I dropped the Thunderbird because I like cycling discs. Even if I really clicked with the Thunderbird, I'd still keep a PD in the bag for when the wind picks up or if I need a sharper hyzer finish.

Disclaimer - I've only thrown max weight C and S-Line PDs and max weight glow thunderbirds. There are quite a few variants of each disc so YMMV.

Last edited by DGHippie; 12-18-2015 at 05:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:32 PM
hugheshilton's Avatar
hugheshilton hugheshilton is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Beaverton, OR
Years Playing: 9.2
Courses Played: 44
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 2,753
Niced 666 Times in 389 Posts
Default

I've never liked the anhyzer top on the PD. Seems to make me not get a consistent release with it, although I completely understand that that's my own issue and probably also due to me never taking the time to really learn to throw them.

Anyway I'm currently throwing DX Thunderbirds, which I love. They start out very beefy but still with some glide, I'd say beefier than the S-PD's I've thrown (granted I've only thrown a couple). I've thrown champion and GStar Thunderbirds briefly as well, and they both started out less overstable than the DX. I haven't thrown a Star Thunderbird, but I've heard they are quite OS with less glide. Given the variance in Thunderbirds by plastic, I'm guessing you could cover all the same lines people use PDs for, but my experience is fairly limited so I could be wrong. Possibly the more OS runs of C-PDs are still more OS than a Star Thunderbird?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:34 PM
SD86's Avatar
SD86 SD86 is offline
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Courses Played: 8
Posts: 9,132
Niced 2,177 Times in 1,604 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidrboy View Post
Let's have a civil and meaningful discussion about the differences between these two seemingly-identical discs. Let's leave the obviously-inferior Starfire out of it.
http://www.inboundsdiscgolf.com/cont...896321777921OO
You want a civil discussion then proceed to slander the Starfire like that?!?!?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:37 PM
SD86's Avatar
SD86 SD86 is offline
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Courses Played: 8
Posts: 9,132
Niced 2,177 Times in 1,604 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGHippie View Post
I've used both of them as faster alternatives to my eagles. In my experience, PDs are more similar to a longer Eagle X's and Thunderbird are more similar to longer fresh Eagle L's.
I'll buy that for a dollar, though maybe a Canadian dollar.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:39 PM
ilmcgee ilmcgee is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Years Playing: 49.9
Courses Played: 4
Posts: 2,068
Niced 167 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderMuffin View Post
Why would you call the Starfire inferior, let alone "obviously" inferior? They're a damn good mold and anyone who has known the market for a decade or more will agree with me.

PD > Starfire I understand the argument. The Thunderbird hasn't even been out for a year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD86 View Post
You want a civil discussion then proceed to slander the Starfire like that?!?!?
Haha
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:46 PM
OB Four's Avatar
OB Four OB Four is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Courses Played: 43
Posts: 643
Niced 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default

I mainly throw first run PDs, so take that in mind in my comments..

They are pretty similar discs in feel and flight. The main difference for me is the glide. They both have similar distance potential, I'm typically throwing them in the 370-400 range. The Thunderbird will get there by glide and the PD will get there by speed. The PD typically works better in wind for me also.
Reply With Quote
 

  #10  
Old 12-18-2015, 05:52 PM
BirdieMachine's Avatar
BirdieMachine BirdieMachine is offline
Michael Moore Fan Club President
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Under Par
Years Playing: 28.6
Courses Played: 58
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,701
Niced 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I don't always agree with the charts but they are pretty close to my experience with these two. Biggest difference is that the SPD has a little earlier and harder fade then the Champ Thunderbird. I prefer the Thundy. I've thought about trying the CD-2 also, seems very close to the Thunderbird also spec and chart wise.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thunderbird NuNinja Discs 1922 11-02-2019 04:49 PM
Thunderbird VS PD DavidHedvin Discs 30 03-30-2017 07:20 PM
Protostamp Thunderbird pksam The Marketplace 5 05-18-2016 08:14 PM
Mcbeth 3x Thunderbird jdye16 Discs 19 11-24-2014 08:20 PM
Thunderbird, how's it treating you? Squirrilah Fish Discs 10 10-03-2014 04:41 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.