#121  
Old 05-29-2014, 11:52 AM
DavidSauls's Avatar
DavidSauls DavidSauls is online now
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newberry, SC
Years Playing: 23.4
Courses Played: 125
Posts: 14,223
Niced 2,028 Times in 968 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve West View Post
Maybe I don't know what you mean by "ability to score well". I thought that was exactly what should be measured to set par.
Oversimplification: Imagine a course of all par-3s. On one, the average score on each hole (for the skill level involved) is 2.8. On another, it's 3.2. Each hole might have par set correctly, yet a 54 on the first course is much worse than a 54 on the second.
Sponsored Links
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 05-29-2014, 12:40 PM
ohtobediscing's Avatar
ohtobediscing ohtobediscing is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: VW Vanagon
Years Playing: 39.2
Courses Played: 345
Throwing Style: LHBH
Posts: 2,350
Niced 57 Times in 35 Posts
Default

I thought par was decided with a Ouija board, 3 soon-to-be-dead chickens, a rock/paper/scissors tourney, and a half-gallon of tequila.



Last edited by ohtobediscing; 05-29-2014 at 12:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 05-29-2014, 03:14 PM
Steve West Steve West is offline
Par Delusionary
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Years Playing: 44.5
Courses Played: 322
Posts: 4,302
Niced 1,065 Times in 556 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohtobediscing View Post
I thought par was decided with a Ouija board, 3 soon-to-be-dead chickens, a rock/paper/scissors tourney, and a half-gallon of tequila.


Yep, count the chickens, and that's par.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 05-29-2014, 03:25 PM
MrFixIt's Avatar
MrFixIt MrFixIt is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: JAWJUH
Years Playing: 11.7
Courses Played: 40
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,700
Niced 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohtobediscing View Post
I thought par was decided with a Ouija board, 3 soon-to-be-dead chickens, a rock/paper/scissors tourney, and a half-gallon of tequila.


The way some courses have their pars established, I kinda believe this^
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 05-29-2014, 03:43 PM
Steve West Steve West is offline
Par Delusionary
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Years Playing: 44.5
Courses Played: 322
Posts: 4,302
Niced 1,065 Times in 556 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidSauls View Post
Oversimplification: Imagine a course of all par-3s. On one, the average score on each hole (for the skill level involved) is 2.8. On another, it's 3.2. Each hole might have par set correctly, yet a 54 on the first course is much worse than a 54 on the second.
That's one way. Not very likely, but as an exercise: Even if all the holes have the same average, they would likely have some variation in scoring distribution across holes. So, by using mode (or some other percentile less than 50) instead of average to set par, the first course would likely have some par 2s and the second course some par 4s. The total par might come out to be 48 for the first and 56 for the second. It wouldn't be exactly as difficult to get under par on both courses, but it would be closer to equal than what would happen with the pars mostly seen today, or even if scoring average par were the standard. (Especially if 2s aren't used).

I figured the original comment was prompted by the expectation that some courses would offer more birdie opportunities. Which would be true if par were set to scoring average. But with percentile par both courses would have pars (almost always) lower than those averages. With par set at the lowest score that a significant percent of expert players achieve, there would be far fewer birdie opportunities, so for all courses there would be a narrower gap between par and the best anyone could be expected to play. Therefore, it would be more nearly equally difficult (across courses) to score under par.

As for scoring worse than par, percentile par would allow the two courses with the same par to have more unequal opportunities to get over par scores. That's OK, I'll take the trade-off of less-accurate comparisons of worse players for more-accurate comparisons of better players.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 05-29-2014, 04:29 PM
DavidSauls's Avatar
DavidSauls DavidSauls is online now
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newberry, SC
Years Playing: 23.4
Courses Played: 125
Posts: 14,223
Niced 2,028 Times in 968 Posts
Default

My example was extreme---no one's building a course where all the holes average 3.2---but there could still be enough variation between courses that you wouldn't want a tournament on multiple courses, with the results used head-to-head, as I believe Scarpfish was referring to.

I'm a fan of tough-par holes. Where the distribution might be 10% birdie, 50% par, 30% bogey, 10% worse. I wouldn't build a whole course of these, but put enough on a course and it'll make a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 05-29-2014, 04:37 PM
mashnut's Avatar
mashnut mashnut is offline
*Super Moderator*
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Years Playing: 16.7
Courses Played: 828
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 14,396
Niced 23 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidSauls View Post
My example was extreme---no one's building a course where all the holes average 3.2---but there could still be enough variation between courses that you wouldn't want a tournament on multiple courses, with the results used head-to-head, as I believe Scarpfish was referring to.

I'm a fan of tough-par holes. Where the distribution might be 10% birdie, 50% par, 30% bogey, 10% worse. I wouldn't build a whole course of these, but put enough on a course and it'll make a difference.
I like some holes like that, they separate out a different part of the field than the holes that play say 30% birdie, 50% par, 20% bogey and above. I like a mix of the tough and easier holes at any given par level throughout a course for that reason.
Reply With Quote
 

  #128  
Old 05-29-2014, 04:58 PM
WhiteyBear's Avatar
WhiteyBear WhiteyBear is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Courses Played: 25
Posts: 875
Niced 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

http://youtu.be/wz-PtEJEaqY

NO, the youtube function won't work with this video...nuts


Par is pretty much decided the same way in DG.

Last edited by WhiteyBear; 05-29-2014 at 05:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Par 4s - multiple in a row or sprinkle par 3s into them? ToddL Course Design 9 02-23-2018 10:47 AM
Poorly designed par 4,5,and par 6 holes and bad high par courses optidiscic Course Design 159 09-12-2014 11:53 AM
Decided to start over(Need Critiquing) Tcedotal Form Analysis/Critique 9 07-01-2014 09:38 AM
Deuce or die par 3's or play for par, par 3's? BrotherDave Disc Golf Courses 14 04-29-2011 01:04 AM
Par and Pro Par for multiple tees with different pars? marcusmpe General Disc Golf Chat 6 04-26-2010 07:13 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.