#111  
Old 10-05-2020, 05:31 PM
araytx araytx is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Years Playing: 14.3
Courses Played: 213
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 2,644
Niced 634 Times in 374 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve West View Post
So you would be OK if the 2m rule was always in effect, but only for the trees the TD specifies?
I would.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSMGS18 View Post
Restrict OHs to scramble shots only. For me, if I have to throw an OH, I'm either off the fairway in jail, or the hole has no good line to the basket other than that.

Also ratings cap some age divisions (MA40 for example).

Both of these are directly related to a local guy plaiying MA40 instead of MA1 and placing 1 back of a sponsered pro who played MPO on the same layout.
Nope. He's 40. and an amateur. Give him a break.
Sponsored Links
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 10-05-2020, 06:44 PM
DiscFifty DiscFifty is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Years Playing: 9.7
Courses Played: 19
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,355
Niced 1,668 Times in 923 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSMGS18 View Post
Also ratings cap some age divisions (MA40 for example).

Both of these are directly related to a local guy plaiying MA40 instead of MA1 and placing 1 back of a sponsered pro who played MPO on the same layout.
Here in the DFW area we have 40, 50, 55+ ams who are rated 940,950+. It just looks silly for them to be competing in local c-tiers against guys 50-90+ points BELOW their rating. The ones that don't register until the division is close to being full (of much less rated players), well.....winning plastic appears to be fantastic.

I had one 940+ rated am old dude guy that I've played with several times in the past ask me why I'm playing intermediate now days and not in the age protected divisions. I said "probably the same reason you aren't playing advanced". lol..
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 10-05-2020, 06:48 PM
DiscFifty DiscFifty is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Years Playing: 9.7
Courses Played: 19
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,355
Niced 1,668 Times in 923 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSMGS18 View Post
Also ratings cap some age divisions (MA40 for example).

Both of these are directly related to a local guy plaiying MA40 instead of MA1 and placing 1 back of a sponsered pro who played MPO on the same layout.
Here in the DFW area we have 40, 50, 55+ ams who are rated 940,950+. It just looks silly for them to be competing in local c-tiers against guys 50-90+ points BELOW their rating. The ones that don't register until the division is close to being full (of much less rated players), well.....winning plastic appears to be fantastic.

I had one 940+ rated am old dude guy that I've played with several times in the past ask me why I'm playing intermediate now days and not in the age protected divisions. I said "probably the same reason you aren't playing advanced". lol..

Quote:
Originally Posted by araytx View Post
Quoted for attention...
This is not a dig at you btw, you're one of the few that will typically move up or play pro when available.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 10-07-2020, 06:00 PM
araytx araytx is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: DFW
Years Playing: 14.3
Courses Played: 213
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 2,644
Niced 634 Times in 374 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscFifty View Post
Here in the DFW area we have 40, 50, 55+ ams who are rated 940,950+. It just looks silly for them to be competing in local c-tiers against guys 50-90+ points BELOW their rating. The ones that don't register until the division is close to being full (of much less rated players), well.....winning plastic appears to be fantastic.

I had one 940+ rated am old dude guy that I've played with several times in the past ask me why I'm playing intermediate now days and not in the age protected divisions. I said "probably the same reason you aren't playing advanced". lol..



This is not a dig at you btw, you're one of the few that will typically move up or play pro when available.
Thanks. I've even played up sometimes with no return possible other than a trophy -- which I did get once! yay!

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 10-08-2020, 11:07 AM
_MTL_ _MTL_ is offline
Flippy Flopper
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Years Playing: 27.5
Courses Played: 143
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,173
Niced 1,215 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscFifty View Post
Here in the DFW area we have 40, 50, 55+ ams who are rated 940,950+. It just looks silly for them to be competing in local c-tiers against guys 50-90+ points BELOW their rating. The ones that don't register until the division is close to being full (of much less rated players), well.....winning plastic appears to be fantastic.
I 100% support never forcing a player to play a pro division.

However, I strongly believe that amateur age protected divisions should have rating caps in B and C tiers.

Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 10-08-2020, 11:28 AM
Cgkdisc's Avatar
Cgkdisc Cgkdisc is online now
.:Hall of Fame Member:.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Years Playing: 31.7
Courses Played: 711
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 12,904
Niced 2,683 Times in 1,125 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscFifty View Post
Here in the DFW area we have 40, 50, 55+ ams who are rated 940,950+. It just looks silly for them to be competing in local c-tiers against guys 50-90+ points BELOW their rating. The ones that don't register until the division is close to being full (of much less rated players), well.....winning plastic appears to be fantastic.

I had one 940+ rated am old dude guy that I've played with several times in the past ask me why I'm playing intermediate now days and not in the age protected divisions. I said "probably the same reason you aren't playing advanced". lol..
Age protected players not playing pro age protected divisions, with high enough ratings to contend, isn't as much of an issue as the reason why lower rated age protected players complain about those players when they have the opportunity to contend in the appropriate MA2, MA3, MA4 division and don't enter there. The underlying social factor is few men over age 40 seem to enjoy playing with men under age 40 even if their skill levels are similar.

Niced: (2)
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 10-08-2020, 02:45 PM
DiscFifty DiscFifty is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Years Playing: 9.7
Courses Played: 19
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,355
Niced 1,668 Times in 923 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cgkdisc View Post
Age protected players not playing pro age protected divisions, with high enough ratings to contend, isn't as much of an issue as the reason why lower rated age protected players complain about those players when they have the opportunity to contend in the appropriate MA2, MA3, MA4 division and don't enter there. The underlying social factor is few men over age 40 seem to enjoy playing with men under age 40 even if their skill levels are similar.
I used to buy into this same line of thinking until I realized the level of commitment to the game it takes for anyone to become advanced rated, especially at age 40+. No reason for them not to be competing against other advanced rated players, regardless of age.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 10-09-2020, 03:18 PM
Discraft Dad's Avatar
Discraft Dad Discraft Dad is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Courses Played: 18
Posts: 144
Niced 83 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan27 View Post
Personally I think they should limit the number of disc you can carry to say 7 (arbitrary but maybe even less). If you can't make most shots you need with that amount then you should have to improve your technique
I agree that there should be a limit but 7 seems kind of low. I would say no more than 12.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 10-09-2020, 06:28 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 17.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 7,125
Niced 1,213 Times in 1,000 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Discraft Dad View Post
I agree that there should be a limit but 7 seems kind of low. I would say no more than 12.
I say no more then 20 discs, it is NOT TRADITIONAL GOLF where the ball is not a club unlike like Disc golf where the Disc is thrown.
Reply With Quote
 

  #120  
Old 10-09-2020, 06:43 PM
Casey 1988 Casey 1988 is offline
Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Pierre, South Dakota, USA
Years Playing: 17.4
Courses Played: 25
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 7,125
Niced 1,213 Times in 1,000 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _MTL_ View Post
I 100% support never forcing a player to play a pro division.

However, I strongly believe that amateur age protected divisions should have rating caps in B and C tiers.
I do not think the 40 Age protected divisions should have rating cap maybe one to play the age group down but that they need to have intermediate and advanced for the age protected divisions with the ones under the max age group having a beginner/rec combo as well. The youth under 18 age divisions should have a rating cap for the age group, that is the lower end of the non age division groups if they could fall under the Rec-Am 1 divisions as one of the max ratings for a youth age divisions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aren't Rules scenerios fun, here's another and I'll add a poll prerube Rules Questions & Discussion 60 03-31-2011 08:33 AM
When to add a course peabody Course Development 5 08-09-2010 11:06 AM
To Add or Not To Add (to course directory)? volklgirl Disc Golf Courses 35 06-04-2009 10:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.