#11  
Old 08-23-2019, 05:15 PM
pearlybakerbest pearlybakerbest is offline
Par Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Finger Lakes
Years Playing: 15.6
Courses Played: 64
Posts: 210
Niced 145 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Shorewinds blue course at lakeside state park in western NY is a par 71 and plays every bit as challenging as par would indicate. I think these type of courses are great for tournament golf, but for casual, everyday play a fun yet demanding par 3 course is just fine.
Sponsored Links

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2019, 05:23 PM
dreadlock86's Avatar
dreadlock86 dreadlock86 is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: DFW, tx
Years Playing: 12.6
Courses Played: 327
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 1,917
Niced 286 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Three Putt and Chuck already mentioned Ozark Mountain... looks like SSA was right around there but the par was listed at 72. that was my favorite course that has gone extinct.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2019, 05:38 PM
Monocacy's Avatar
Monocacy Monocacy is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Maryland
Years Playing: 19.5
Courses Played: 167
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 1,586
Niced 468 Times in 214 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Putt for D'oh View Post
A topic, maybe a bit related?, I considered asking here has to do with earth moving and terra forming for a disc golf course as is done in ball golf.
I believe there was considerable earth moved in construction of Parc des Familles, a John Houck course in a Louisiana cypress swamp.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-23-2019, 06:49 PM
JC17393 JC17393 is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Years Playing: 21.9
Courses Played: 151
Throwing Style: LHBH
Posts: 7,884
Niced 3,829 Times in 1,580 Posts
Default

Tyler State Park East, long tees to the C pins was a true par 72 until the last couple years in which the emerald ash borer forced a lot of tree removal and knocked a couple of the par 5s to par 4. Though 72 at last year's Yetter, played on the post EAB culling course, was rated 999.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-24-2019, 12:13 AM
scarpfish's Avatar
scarpfish scarpfish is offline
Resident Grouch
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brownbackistan
Years Playing: 16.4
Courses Played: 360
Posts: 8,146
Niced 736 Times in 257 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonclark.lancaster View Post
Do you think the future of disc golf will see the standardization of a par layout like ball golf or remain somewhat inconsistent like it currently seems to be? Would it even benefit the sport? Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
Will more championship courses lean that direction? Yes. Will leaning that direction be the norm for all new courses installed? Nope. Would it benefit the sport if it did? Not really.

I see absolutely no benefit in disc golf trying to mimic every aspect of ball golf precepts, especially in respect to this overwrought debate over "par". Using ball golf constructs to establish disc golf par is why every discussion thread on the subject turns into a dumpster fire.

Niced: (3)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-24-2019, 01:23 AM
ru4por's Avatar
ru4por ru4por is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Dearborn Michigan
Years Playing: 36.5
Courses Played: 248
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 3,980
Niced 1,730 Times in 753 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by takman View Post
Jeez I hope not. I love the diversity of course types and pars and challenge that this sport offers, it's why I don't play 'ball golf' anymore, monotony. I wish there were more longer par 54 courses with crazy tough holes. Todays top pros eat up the par 4s and 5s because most take the challenge off of the tee shot. I think disc golf should make every effort to NOT standardize or follow ball golf......except the money of course.
Nice summarization of my thoughts takman. I don't think we should be striving to make changes to be more like golf.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-24-2019, 01:57 AM
wolfhaley's Avatar
wolfhaley wolfhaley is online now
Par Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: marshfield
Years Playing: 15.6
Courses Played: 413
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 144
Niced 100 Times in 60 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if it applies to this but the bear at Highbridge Hills is listed at 71. Chuck would know more about this but all I know is that course was crazy hard. I only played the bear proper once. It was woodland bear before that. That course is nothing like a golf course though.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-24-2019, 07:31 AM
Horsman's Avatar
Horsman Horsman is offline
Pandamonium Discs
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Years Playing: 13.5
Courses Played: 170
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,311
Niced 728 Times in 333 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cgkdisc View Post
Ozark topped 70 maybe even 72. Patterson Lake temp course for ND championships has also been in the 72 area.
I can vouch for Patterson Lake. It was a lot of big open shots but had the woods mixed in everywhere it could be. One of the more frustrating courses I have ever played.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-24-2019, 09:25 AM
DSmith's Avatar
DSmith DSmith is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Greens-bro North Cacka-lacka
Years Playing: 14.6
Courses Played: 177
Posts: 735
Niced 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Reaching the goal of producing a true par 72 course, whether blue or gold level, would be a great accomplishment but would your local casual players repeat play on it or bitch about how its too hard and takes too long to play?

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
 

  #20  
Old 08-24-2019, 09:33 AM
Horsman's Avatar
Horsman Horsman is offline
Pandamonium Discs
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Years Playing: 13.5
Courses Played: 170
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 4,311
Niced 728 Times in 333 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSmith View Post
Reaching the goal of producing a true par 72 course, whether blue or gold level, would be a great accomplishment but would your local casual players repeat play on it or bitch about how its too hard and takes too long to play?
I feel like this would easily be solved with some short tees. Ive played plenty of hard courses where the longs are a strong kick in the teeth but the shorts are a fun test.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legit Par 2's? duckychucky Course Design 222 05-30-2016 10:41 PM
Poorly designed par 4,5,and par 6 holes and bad high par courses optidiscic Course Design 159 09-12-2014 11:53 AM
Disc golf of golf courses: the future of disc golf? & Sequoyah State Park in Oklahoma Dan H. Disc Golf Courses 27 06-19-2013 01:21 PM
Par 72 Disc Golf? kfellmy General Disc Golf Chat 9 05-04-2012 11:38 PM
I don't understand Disc Golf Par Piqsid General Disc Golf Chat 88 06-29-2010 09:13 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.