|
Register | Members List | Social Groups |
- View All Groups | ||
- Your Group Messages | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had this one happen a little while back. It was a New England Team Challenge so, competitive, but casual. No caddy book or anything.
Hole shape is mando about 70 feet up the fairway, must pass tree on right, fairway is wooded on either side, and the hole doglegs left after the mando. Player throws his drive, it makes the mando but hits the next tree and comes backwards on the left side of the mando. On his next throw does he have to go through the mando? Sponsored Links
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://www.pdga.com/faq/rules/qa-ma...k-around-other
I think this picture addresses the situation you're describing: ![]()
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep. Tomorrow the ruling on that is very clear.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
To me, once beyond the mando like OP stated it's nullified. Tree kick or rollaway doesn't matter. They successfully went right of the mando regardless of what happened afterwards. Why would they alter anything about this rule(s)?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The wrong side of the mando is a prohibited route, rather than the correct side being a required route. Here is the 2022 rule: Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I have an understanding of this new rule....
With the new rule, there's no mention of where the disc comes to rest. It used to be that if the disc passed to the 'wrong' side of the mando, but came back around the mando marker, finally coming to rest on the 'good' side of the mando...the throw was good. Now, with no mention of the disc coming to rest, if it fully enters the restricted area the thrower gets the penalty. Look at my crappy drawing of a double mando....everything between the double mando and the road (OB) is restricted area. The double mando is shown by the line between the two mando poles. It used to be that if the disc followed the brown line and ended up to the right of the mando, it was good. But with the 2022 rule, the disc completely entered the restricted area, so the player has to take a penalty and go to the drop zone. Imagine if the OB rule was worded the same, then a disc that entered the OB would be OB regardless if it came back inbounds somewhere. --Disclaimer, I don't know if the proper term for that is a double mando, or just a mando. There's two mando poles, but a line is from one to the other. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The "restricted space" is a vertical plane, not an area on the ground. You're not allowed to throw your disc through the vertical plane. On your drawing the mando was missed when the brown line first crossed the green line. Nothing after that matters. Take a penalty and go to the drop zone. (Important note: This particular example would be a crappy way to design a mando because of the difficulty of actually seeing whether the brown line ever passed between the poles or not.)
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Then it would be a mandatory, not OB. OB and mandatories serve two different purposes. One is based on position, the other on flight. There is a reason they are written differently.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Think of the Restricted Space (Missed Mando) plane as a pane of fragile glass. If your disc breaks the glass coming through its front OR back side, you get penalized.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is this a missed mando ? | araytx | Rules Questions & Discussion | 108 | 08-15-2016 09:24 AM |
![]() |
tu-f-o | Discs | 56 | 06-11-2014 11:28 PM |
Mando or no mando | JoakimBL | Rules Questions & Discussion | 16 | 05-12-2014 09:45 AM |
Drive hits the mando object.. second throw mando? | jeverett | General Disc Golf Chat | 19 | 02-08-2011 04:17 AM |
Quadruple Mando? | Cgkdisc | Disc Golf Courses | 44 | 07-16-2010 09:05 PM |