#1  
Old 09-08-2020, 09:19 AM
KniceZ's Avatar
KniceZ KniceZ is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: VA Northern Neck
Years Playing: 9.8
Courses Played: 102
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 1,282
Niced 44 Times in 32 Posts
Default Lets talk tournament trends

I'm losing interest in watching top tier professional tournaments. It seems that the trend is to open combo golf/DG courses with hole after hole of 500-1000+ ft bombers with artificial out of bounds lines. I understand that these types of courses are much easier to film but I find this type of DG boring.

Am I not watching enough tournaments to see the full gamut, or is DG tournaments truly moving from the tight technical courses that are predominant in the east to open field bombing?

Does everyone else likes this trend?
Sponsored Links

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2020, 09:43 AM
ru4por's Avatar
ru4por ru4por is offline
* Ace Member *
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Dearborn Michigan
Years Playing: 37.4
Courses Played: 250
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 5,066
Niced 4,158 Times in 1,469 Posts
Default

I mostly don't care. i want to play. Watching pros play is about 2% of my disc golf interest and activity. I am active in a club that runs 4 leagues and 6-8 tournaments. Between planning, running and playing in those, with an abundance of casual rounds and throw in some road trips, I just don't have, nor want to make time for watching. Their game does not really translate to my skillset. Yes, the courses are often bad. I don't think the pro game has any vested interest in AM growth, outside the money to be made. That is not a bad thing, they should be business people, but it is contrary to what I am trying to accomplish.

I watch some post coverage, but I am picky as to what tournaments I watch.

Niced: (3)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2020, 10:18 AM
Moose33 Moose33 is offline
Salient/Yikun Groupie
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Years Playing: 8.8
Courses Played: 82
Throwing Style: RHFH
Posts: 5,867
Niced 1,506 Times in 961 Posts
Default

I watch a lot, but I agree that a lot of these more open tournaments while easier for people to film and shoot gaudy scores we do lose something that the right technical courses showcase.

I know a lot of it is down to willing TDs and grouped courses but it would be cool if we had some more conscious wooded courses thrown in.

Sort of like the road courses in NASCAR that allows a different type of player to do well, and showcase the true dominance of a great one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2020, 10:22 AM
jakebake91 jakebake91 is offline
Double Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: West Central Wisconsin
Years Playing: 4.4
Courses Played: 7
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 1,798
Niced 1,313 Times in 652 Posts
Default

I agree. Watching the preserve, for example, was awful. I like watching a 600' drive here and there, but yeah. #keepdiscsgolfinthewoods
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2020, 10:47 AM
Robbio123 Robbio123 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Years Playing: 3.3
Courses Played: 43
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 12
Niced 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I understand the OP and agree that emerging trend is towards open golf as newer pro events come online. I think though there is a thinking surrounding enabling the event to cater towards larger galleries and media.

Some of these newer events are trying to get bigger in nature to bring in larger groups of amateur players in surrounding courses courses which then feed into the gallery of the MPO/FPO event creating more of a circus like event generating excitement and sales opportunities. Looking at Ledgestone, Nate has done a stellar job of growing the event bringing in thousands of Amateurs to compete. He's supplemented that with an online digital store where he's done a great job taking over Discraft's production capacity. All in all, this brings significant revenue from players for local businesses and local businesses which also feeds into the pro scene. All this activity really creates a lot of ancillary opportunity and cash for Pros. Ledgestone is a successful model that I believe many tournament organizers are trying to emulate. A big part of that is creating a wide open enough space to enable the foot traffic. Don't forget, Ledgestone also has wooded courses in play as well. but, when you walk that property, it's harder for large galleries to follow freely. There's natural choke points you can't avoid in wooded layouts.

Not all Pro tournaments are like this, but the DGPT does seem to trend in this direction as Nate has been super successful in laying out a model that is working. For all the complaining we see online that the Pro's don't make much $$ in tourney play, this model seems to prove it has merits.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-08-2020, 11:01 AM
BillFleming BillFleming is offline
Birdie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Arizona
Years Playing: 1.8
Courses Played: 7
Throwing Style: RHFH
Posts: 426
Niced 252 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KniceZ View Post
I'm losing interest in watching top tier professional tournaments. It seems that the trend is to open combo golf/DG courses with hole after hole of 500-1000+ ft bombers with artificial out of bounds lines. I understand that these types of courses are much easier to film but I find this type of DG boring.

Am I not watching enough tournaments to see the full gamut, or is DG tournaments truly moving from the tight technical courses that are predominant in the east to open field bombing?

Does everyone else likes this trend?
At 60 years old, I can't throw as far as the majority of guys on the pro tour. I still enjoy watching the videos and seeing their throws.

But! I mainly watch the ladies tournaments. While a bunch of them can still out throw me, I learn a lot more from them. Since most aren't 'bombers', they have to play more strategically and I'm starting to learn how to do that. Instead of going for the ace off the tee pad, or the birdie from 50 feet away, I'm learning to go for the par and be happy. If I could consistently go for the par, I'd have a much better score than what I've been getting.

I wish the ladies would do some 'how-to' videos, I might learn more from their slower arm speeds.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-09-2020, 12:15 PM
Ryan C Ryan C is offline
Birdie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Courses Played: 1
Posts: 265
Niced 85 Times in 50 Posts
Default

I mean, we just had a couple of very technical pro tour events.

I think some courses do it better than others. Milo MvGyver (sp?) is a good example of a course that allows the bombers to showcase their skills, but also offers some technicality where a very specific shot shape is the only path to birdie.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-09-2020, 12:40 PM
autocrosscrx autocrosscrx is online now
Birdie Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Years Playing: 3.3
Courses Played: 3
Throwing Style: RHBH
Posts: 308
Niced 255 Times in 124 Posts
Default

I think open courses show better. Woods play may be more compelling as a competition, but watching woods golf frustrates me. On some of these holes, the pro steps up to the box, you see about 100 trees, you locate the biggest gap, then the pro fires something that veers off your screen in a totally different spot, the announcers say that may or may not be good, then the footage pans to another angle where the disc plinkos off a couple of trees and lands, then they pan out to the basket, but you can't really tell if it is 15 or 45 or 75 feet.

Niced: (1)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-09-2020, 01:10 PM
hiflyer's Avatar
hiflyer hiflyer is offline
Eagle Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SoCal
Years Playing: 24.8
Courses Played: 23
Throwing Style: LHBH
Posts: 678
Niced 425 Times in 227 Posts
Default

Wide open disc golf is boring to watch and more so to play: The main reason I don't bother to watch anymore. Furthermore, these "courses" help the "DG should be more like ball golf" mantra, which is a current cancer in our game.
Reply With Quote
 

  #10  
Old 09-09-2020, 01:22 PM
Rastnav Rastnav is offline
Birdie Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Durham, NC
Courses Played: 17
Posts: 441
Niced 258 Times in 148 Posts
Default

When people here aren’t complaining about open courses, they are complaining about wooded courses with “too many trees”. There just isn’t a way to satisfy everyone, and certainly not all the time. The last DGPT event had plenty of tight, wooded action to go along with more open holes or shots. The GMC has grown on the strength of the pro response to those courses, which mostly haven’t changed. It has nothing to do with DGPT, filming, or the like.

Yes, there are always going to be more ball golf conversion courses than in the past, because in the past there were hardly any. But it’s not as if we don’t have phenomenal new events like the Canadian Open on fantastic wooded courses as well.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So lets talk about Kansas City. BigGAC1 Disc Golf Courses 13 04-08-2014 10:12 PM
Lets talk combo!!! Ordered Chaos Discs 70 10-01-2010 04:06 AM
lets talk distance ChronoDisc Discs 49 06-03-2009 01:44 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.