Oak Brook, IL 
Central Park Share
Uploaded By: jenco Hole #8 (Taken 8/2013)
3 / 250ft.   3 / 250ft.   3 / 250ft. Par / Distance:
Hole #8 Basket

 Share URL:

Course Rating Distribution

Reviews: 16
Avg. Rating:
Clear FiltersFilter/Sort
Reviews between: and Sort By:
Exp. (in years): Played: Reviewed: Only Trusted Reviewers
< Prev 1 2
A Hidden Technical Gem

1    8/11/2017   8/11/2017
Review By: amryan11
Played: 36  Reviewed: 23  Exp: 12.2 Years
This review was updated on 8/19/2017
3 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: - great technical challenge, but not impossible for newer players
- fantastic, large brick primary tees as well as many holes with alternate tees/pin locations
- well manicured - despite many holes being in the woods, no excessive rough/overgrowth
- cool water hazard shot on hole 9
- good mix of lengths
- very nice signage including course map at beginning
- ample parking
- some pretty cool hill shots on 5, 8, and 9
Cons: - pretty long walk from 2 to 3
- hole 6 appeared to be "closed" when i was there and isn't as well-manicured as the others
- hole 9 doesn't really take you all the way back to the course start
Other Thoughts: I think this is really about a 3.25 for me. There aren't many cons, this is a very well-designed and fun course. It would be cool if there were room for 18 holes, but I'd much rather play a high-quality 9 hole than a crammed in 18. The shots are mostly challenging technical lines through narrow tree-lined fairways. There is a decent amount of shade on most holes which is nice on hot days. The walk between holes 2 and 3 is quite long, but I don't think it's a big deal and I think it was the best use of the space available. Everything seems to be in very good repair and the signage for each hole is very nice. The tees are a more unique brick/paver material, but they are very level and nicely done. The incorporation of the water hazard and hills is a nice added challenge since the last 2 holes are pretty wide open.

All in all, this is one of the best technical courses in the Chicago suburbs that I have seen. It is definitely worth revisiting and is a lot of fun, especially if you like a challenge to hit your lines.

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.

Favorite course in the Chicago area

5+    2/20/2016   5/5/2017
Review By: krooster
Played: 3  Reviewed: 3
0 Helpful / 3 Not
Pros: Nearly every hole is extremely technical through the woods. A good mix of short and somewhat longer holes, with use of the alternate tees.
Cons: The last couple holes are mostly open.
Other Thoughts: Just a really great course. I wish there were more technical courses like this in the area.

0 of 3 people found this review helpful.

This Course Will Abuse Those Who Can't Throw Straight!

1    6/23/2016   6/23/2016
Review By: The Valkyrie Kid
Played: 1167  Reviewed: 1115  Exp: 39.4 Years
5 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: Central Park DGC is a very technical tests of your skills. I think six of the holes are very tight, narrow and usually have low canopies.

The course has a nice, clear course map at the beginning, along with a practice basket. The tee pads are excellent. They are paver stones with a frame built around them with wood chips. They were a little slippery today with last night's storm and lots of these little berries falling from the trees above. The alternate tees are indoor/outdoor carpet on a raised platform. The new signs are greet giving you all the information you need.

For many players, like myself, this course can be brutal. There are awfully tight lines to hit and missing your line can put you in a world of hurt. And # 9 is an excellent finishing hole. Most players can lay up and then have a relatively easy approach over the water.

# 5 is a 300' throw down a tight fairway and then the basket is set up on a small hill, maybe 8 foot high. It's a very cool hole but extremely treacherous.
Cons: Beside the fact that this course totally handed me my lunch today, I really wasn't thrilled with # 6 ?? Isn't that the hole that plays uphill and then the basket is set in the Parks Department storage and dumping area. It's pretty ugly with piles of brush, old building supplies, pallets and other discards lying about.
The tee pads were covered with these little black berries of some sort making them a little slippery.
Other Thoughts: Overall, if you're a fan of technical courses and like the challenge they offer, then this is the course for you. I like technical courses, I just happen to really suck on them. I think those tight lines cause my eyes to cross thus throwing off my equilibrium and therefore raising havoc with my already pathetic game.

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.

 This course takes some skill

1    4/18/2015   4/20/2015
Review By: uncrandr
Played: 62  Reviewed: 5  Exp: 10.4 Years
3 Helpful / 1 Not
Pros: >>Easy to follow layout with directional signs and multiple tees
>>Great layout throughout the woods
>>The majority of the holes are very wooded and require some accuracy to hit the necessary lines (I enjoy the challenge)
>>On some the tighter openings (wink wink) the trees are wrapped to help protect them from being damaged by the inevitable errant throw. First time I've seen these on a course. Every course should have these on the first couple of trees that take the most punishment.
Cons: >>Only one open hole where you can give it a good rip
>>It's only 9 holes
>>Not a good course for beginners players
Other Thoughts: >>I played with a bunch of newbies and they were not prepared at all for the level of play needed to par this course.
>>The water hazard is a joke. Don't worry about losing a disc. Play this course!
>>Overall awesome 9-hole course!

3 of 4 people found this review helpful.

 A Nice 9

2-4    3/20/2015   3/24/2015
Review By: bigbadberry3
Played: 14  Reviewed: 2
0 Helpful / 5 Not
Pros: Multiple pins, water hole, forested, shorter / technical, easy parking, rarely crowded.
Cons: Shorter course (9 holes), some repetitive holes , only 9 holes, can be louder close to route 83, nine holes only.
Other Thoughts: Easy to get too, well kept up, no holes that are really just bomber holes.

0 of 5 people found this review helpful.

 Toughest Course in Some Time

2-4    8/26/2014   8/26/2014
Review By: nivek1385
Played: 34  Reviewed: 8  Exp: 27.7 Years
1 Helpful / 2 Not
Pros: Six of the holes have two tees, and hole nine has three. Not only this, but the shorter tees are on an elevated platform with astroturf for the teepad itself. The long tees are an elevated platform with landscaping pavers marking the teepad itself. Each hole has a tee sign sponsored by a local business with a nice map of each tee location, each possible basket location (a few holes have alternate positions). There are trash bins, benches, and even picnic tables throughout the course. The course is set among a large park complex with soccer fields (astroturf), baseball diamonds, playgrounds, swimming pool(s) complete with water slides, a recreation building with a friendly staff, etc. The recreation building has discs available for rental, but I didn't check on what was available. The course is well-manicured and the fairways from 3-7 consist of wood chips.
Cons: The tee signs are only located near the long tees. The holes with multiple basket locations do not mark in which location the pin is currently located. There is a poorly marked permanent gullystream on hole 2. The pond that you have to throw across on hole 9 (for the A pin location) is a no entry pond, meaning that if you don't make it, good luck getting the disc back (thankfully, my disc in the pond was at the edge). The biggest issue with the course is the long walk from hole two's basket to hole three's tee, but it is well-marked along the pathway to keep going until the very end.
Other Thoughts: The day I went, the course was a bit muddy, but it hasn't rained the last couple of days. I saw a number of small animals throughout the course. From hole 3 to hole 7, the fairways are very tight and if you miss on either side, you go into dense "forest" where it's only 4-10 feet deep, but filled with tall, thin trees set anywhere from ~3 inches to ~15 inches apart, making it very difficult to retrieve your disc let alone play out of the trees. I've not played a course this tight in the last couple of years, and it may be the tightest fairways I've seen. Definitely a fun and challenging course (2/3 rounds I threw ~200 points below my rating, with the middle round right around my rating). This is the best course I've played in Chicagoland by far (only played Knoch Knolls, Maryknoll, O'Brien, IIT, and this one). I would not recommend this course for beginners, though. Between the tight fairways and the over-the-pond throw, beginners will have quite a bit of difficulty with it.

1 of 3 people found this review helpful.

 Immaculate 9 holer

1    8/17/2014   8/21/2014
Review By: Stardoggy
Played: 336  Reviewed: 211  Exp: 6.2 Years
4 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: An absolutely immaculate 9 hole course in the heart of a city park in a richie rich suburb.

2, and sometimes 3 tee pads on each hole. The long set is unbelievably nice paver stones surrounded by gravel, and boxed in by 4x4 wood. The other tees are boxed in the same, with field turf as the tee pad surface. They're seriously some of the best tee pads I've ever seen. The different tees almost always offered a different line.

Great baskets in near perfect condition. They caught great, and there was multiple pin placements on every hole. Most placements offered very different looks at the holes.

The upkeep here is beyond compare. Wooded fairways are completely covered in wood chips, and the rough is very well defined. I can't even imagine how much work must have gone into this.

The golf itself is very good, with well thought out holes. Lines are tight, but fair...if you hit them, you'll feel pretty good about it. Not easy to score low, even on the shorter holes.

A nice water hole (9) to finish. Depending on the tee you're at, you may need two shots to get to the position past the water.

Navigation is very intuitive...the transition from 2 to 3 is a long walk, but there's signs leading you there.
Cons: Not much to list here. Would love to have seen what they could have done with more space.

No major elevation here, but what there is, is used very well.

As great as the wood chip fairways look, they do force you to factor in the skip on the wooded holes. Big skips galore.
Other Thoughts: This is about as good as a 9 hole course is going to get. Insanely manicured, and in a park with outstanding amenities.

The golf is great, it's in a superb neighborhood...nothing to not like here. Bring the family and make a day of it!

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.

 9 hole perfection

5+    9/21/2013   9/21/2013
Review By: SneakyJedi
Played: 95  Reviewed: 46  Exp: 8.4 Years
6 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: - Equipment: The teepads are large and offer plenty of space for a good run-up with great traction. Alternate astro-turf pads work well and look nice as well. New baskets catch well, and the just installed tee-signs are beautiful and helpful with all the information you could want on them. Practice basket with "HORSE" type markers in the ground is nice as well, and gives you a place to warm up when the course is crowded and you are waiting to tee off on 1.

- Landscaping: Course is already beautiful, and will only improve as more work and cleanup is done in the coming months. Wood chips on all fairways look great and provide a nice and somewhat unique playing surface. A decent amount of underbrush has been thinned out to aid in the already easy navigation and prevent inescapable tree-jail from the rough, though some locations still need a bit of work. Most fairways are well shaped.

- Good, technical golf: with the exception of one passable, and one possibly ill-designed hole, (2 and 7) I have enjoyed playing each hole on this course. Tight but generally "fair fairways" require well shaped lines, moderate elevation present throughout the course keeps things interesting, and the pond on the last hole is a nice feature to finish the course. Holes, 3 and especially 5 in particular stand out.

- Multiple tees and pins: Multiple tees on every hole but 2, with 4 (!) on hole 4, and 3 on hole 9. Many of these tees provide drastically different and not necessarily easier lines. Playing through this course twice from the various tees almost gives the feeling of playing a complete 18 hole course. Multiple pin position on several holes which should be changes somewhat regularly should keep things interesting for local players playing frequently as well.
Cons: - As others have said still a little rough around the edges in places, but nothing that really distracts from the golf.

- Doesn't bother me, but some may not appreciate the long walk from 2 to 3, and there isn't really a clear route from hole 9s basket back to the parking lot by hole 1 if there are games being played on the soccer fields.

- Hole 7 seems like a transition hole that the designers attempted to make more interesting with the tight set of trees not far off the pad. Unfortunately, the result is simply a frustrating hole, with 2 or 3 incredibly tight gaps (mere inches of clearance if properly navigated) that must be hit. The slender trees are already scared from being pelted by discs, and may not last all that long anyway. There isn't really anything that can be done to make this a "good" but removing one tree could make it better.

- It's too bad a soccer field backs the basket on hole 9, because a tee pad on the top of the hill would be great, I've had fun throwing from there anyway, but can see how it could present a danger if someone unloads and goes long with a high speed disc.
Other Thoughts: I've really enjoyed playing this course so far, and look forward to getting more familiar with it. I loved the old course, and am delighted the redeisgn has improved what was previously here. I'm sure it will help my accuracy and technical game, as the middle 4-5 holes provide the tight, wooded golf not present on most of the other major courses in the area I play frequently (Madison Meadow and Katherine Legge.)

I struggled on what to give this course. Giving a 4 or above on a 9 hole course, even one with a great number and quality of alternate tees and pins such as this Central Park, is hard to justify. For me it came down to a 3 or 3.5. Not having played a huge number of 9 hole courses (I concede I haven't played a staggering number of courses of any size at his point) I don't have the knowledge base to say this course is among the elite 9 hole courses. However, until I am proven otherwise, I can't see many 9 holes improving on what has been done here.

Perhaps I will re-evaluate later, but right now I feel giving this course 3.5 discs, basically the equivalent of 4.5 for an 18 hole course, is justified.

6 of 6 people found this review helpful.

 Oakbrook is back

5+    8/28/2013   9/3/2013
Review By: DonCasper
Played: 81  Reviewed: 4  Exp: 10.5 Years
7 Helpful / 3 Not
Pros: Variety of holes
Some remarkably solid holes, especially for a 9 hole course
Well isolated from rest of park
Hole #9 is an incredibly fun hole to play from the top of the sled hill.
Nice material for both sets of tee pads.
Cons: Course is still rough around the edges, no distances/tee signs, construction debris evident on a few holes.
Long walk between 2 and 3
A few of the holes are gimmicky, especially 7.
Since it is a 9 hole course, it can get a bit crowded. Benches would be a welcome improvement.
Difficult to see when people are on the alternate tees on holes 3 and 4.
Other Thoughts: I get the feeling from reading the other reviews that they have reviewed this course based more on its potential than its current state. The course in its current condition is not a 3.5 - 4 disc course. The good news is that this course could easily reach that rating with just a few improvements.

1.) Hole #6 is a bit messy from construction still, with piles of dirt and brush in a few places. The rough on the right side can slow down play a lot when new players lose their discs in it. It could be cleared out a bit without affecting play.

2.) Hole 7 could be vastly improved just by removing one tree, which is currently restricting play to 2 narrow gaps on either side of it. This tree will probably end up dead in short order due to its position and slender nature though.

3.) If the brush were cleared out on 3-4 to improve routing on the course and to allow groups on one tee to see groups on the other tee play could be sped up and the chance of accidentally throwing on other groups could be decreased.

A few other thoughts: The grassy tees are actually more comfortable to throw from in wet conditions than the pavers, but I don't know how well they will hold up to use as a pad. It is probably a good thing they only used this material for the short tees.

Overall, a 4+ rating is going to be out of reach due to being a 9 hole course, but with a few minor improvements this course will probably mature to be rated a solid 3.5.

7 of 10 people found this review helpful.

 Not Your Fatherís Oak Brook.

2-4    8/31/2013   9/3/2013
Review By: Three Putt
Played: 132  Reviewed: 85  Exp: 22.8 Years
8 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: Old Oak Brook was the perfect course for my skill level. It was tough enough to punish a recreational player if they played badly but easy enough to cough up birdies when they played well. The "punishment" wasn't severe enough to make you take more than a 4 in most cases, so most days you could hold together the semblance of a decent round. The park was (and still is) well maintained and the course fit well with the other park uses. It was a very nice recreational course.

New Oak Brook pushed me down and took my lunch money. It is a punishing design aimed at serious players. Holes # 1 & # 2 are similar to the old-style Oak Brook, but once you hit the tunnel for # 3 you are in for some serious wooded golf for the next five holes. Hole # 3 is an elevated tee with the pin tucked up to the right with a hellish 300'+ gauntlet of trees masquerading as a fairway. Hole # 5 is an excellent 300'+ downhill shot (from the longs) with the pin set up on a mound to the left. Hole # 6 is a tough uphill turnover shot (from the longs.) Hole # 4 and # 7 are shorter shots with a lot of trees in the fairway. Hole # 8 is an open shot with the pin set on a hillside and # 9 is a mostly open route with a water carry that is 400'+ from the longs.

The course has nice paver tees and signage at the longs. The shorts are turfgrass; I'm not sure all the shorts are in yet but some of them (holes #3-4 come to mind) move the angle of the shot quite a bit. Hole #4 appears to have an alternate placement but I didn't notice any other alternate pins. The course is less than a month old and work is still continuing so alt pins might be in the plans for other holes as well.

Being very new, the shule is rough. You can get in serious trouble when you get out of the fairway. The fairways are chipped in the woods (except # 6, which seemed unfinished.) The flow is natural; the transition from #6 to #7 was the only place I got lost. All in all, it's a challenging Advanced-level 9-hole with very good tees in a very nice park.
Cons: Holes # 3, #4 and # 7 had a lot of trees in the fairway. On hole # 3 in particular you could throw a decent shot and have it kicked away. Even if it wasn't kicked away, you could end up in the fairway with a very tough second shot. On holes #4 and #7 they might be able to argue that the pinball wizard effect on an ace run hole is decent design, but hole # 3 needs to be cleaned out to be fair.

There is a very long but well marked walk from #2 to #3 that really doesn't stand out once you get to #3. It might be a con to some; to me it is what it is.

Hole # 9 has a great elevated shot that is not used. As a golfer it seems like a missed opportunity at a cool shot. As a former parks guy, the elevated shot looks like a really good way to have chuckers flinging Nukes at the soccer field past the pin. So while I agree with the decision not to put a tee there, I went up and threw one from there anyway. It's a fun missed shot.

Nit-picky safety concerns: Hole #1 runs between a parking lot and a turfgrass soccer field. There is a healthy stand of trees to knock down a shot, but it is possible to flip a drive out on the soccer field. Not probable, though. I also saw a bunch of people walk from the parking lot across the fairway totally oblivious to the disc golf course. There should probably be a sign alerting people to the course there.
Other Thoughts: When I got done playing the new design, I wanted to hate it because it wasn't the old course that I had liked so much. Initially to me it seemed like a 9-hole recreational course trying to be something it wasn't. What stops me from hating the new Oak Brook is KLM, the course that went in 10 minutes away while Oak Brook was closed. KLM is a laid-back, lightly wooded park-style course with a lot of the recreational vibe that the old Oak Brook had. With KLM so close by, Oak Brook really doesn't have to be that recreational course anymore. The land was there to add more challenge to it and they did. It compliments KLM now rather than duplicating it; you can hit KLM for a warm up and then get some serious shots in at Oak Brook.

If you run into Serious Steve, be prepared to be shamed into course work. He is not shy at all about grabbing you and putting you to work.

8 of 8 people found this review helpful.

< Prev 1 2

Join Disc Golf Course Review for free to add your review. Have an account already? Sign In to add a review.