Burlington, NC 
Springwood Players' Course Share
Uploaded By: Tenacious EJ Hole #15
4 / 410ft.   4 / 460ft. Par / Distance:
Hole #15 Gold Tee

Course Rating Distribution

Reviews: 18
Avg. Rating:
Clear FiltersFilter/Sort
Reviews between: and Sort By:
Exp. (in years): Played: Reviewed: Only Trusted Reviewers
< Prev 1 2
Enjoyable course

1    12/14/2018   12/15/2018
Review By: ampyun
Played: 20  Reviewed: 4
0 Helpful / 7 Not
Pros: Open field holes and a few tunnel shots. Long anhyzer holes as well are challenging from the long tees. Overall really fun!
Cons: Watch out for pedestrians!

0 of 7 people found this review helpful.

SPC is OK but not great.

5+    7/27/2018   7/27/2018
Review By: DaveL
Played: 15  Reviewed: 2
1 Helpful / 2 Not
Pros: Improvements to the course are being made.
Briars have been cut down on right side of 8.
New walking/cart path makes walking the back 9 a breeze compared to what it was.
Hole 12 B was added which reduces the feeling of walking forever to 13.
Some good holes for big arms, some technical shots.
Cons: Strange afterthought layout.
Signs need updating/replacing.
Some tee pads need final placement.
Can get annoying/distracting when fields are full of spectators watching ball games and they don't realize that they are on the edge of your fairway or affecting your route.
Other Thoughts: With some more improvements, it could boost it's review rating. If you haven't played it in a while, you should try it again in a few months when construction is done.

1 of 3 people found this review helpful.

 Not every course needs 18 holes.

1    5/10/2017   5/10/2017
Review By: Jonjey
Played: 9  Reviewed: 9
7 Helpful / 1 Not
Pros: PROS are mostly that I actually LOVE THIS COURSE. But have to give it a 1, because it is very poorly designed.

- Long wide open holes in an area with extremely few courses that offer this setting. Here in NC 95% of courses are heavily wooded and having this beautiful wide open course is an amazing addition to the area.

- The course is in a beautifully maintained park, which means you don't have to worry too much about snakes, tics, etc.
Cons: CONS;

The major con is that at least 25% of this course should just be scrapped entirely. I absolutely adore the front 9, but I doubt anyone would miss the back 9 if it disappeared tomorrow. From now on when I play this course I'll be playing the front 9 twice rather than even bothering with the back 9. I understand WHY the back 9 is the way it is, they don't have the space to turn that second half of the park into a quality disc golf course. The woods to the right of the fairway through 11 and 12 is some of the thickest and dangerous brush I've experienced in my time playing disc golf. On 12 I threw a fantastic drive that just so happened to touch the one obstacle it could which was a large branch hanging out over the fairway, and it sent my disc about 5 feet into the brush. Alright, no problem right? Just go in and get it? NOPE. It was literally surrounded by a FORTRESS of thorns and poison oak. This is not acceptable in my opinion, the parks&rec team should do something about that because I got shredded by hook thorns trying to get my disc back, which I couldn't actually do at first (Until I came back with some devices from my car to get the job done.)
Other Thoughts: Overall, I love the idea of this course and I want it to be better. I'm glad that they changed 3 from a 1,000 ft hole into two separate holes, but they need to update the signs because that's super confusing! As others have said the par 6 and par 2 nonsense needs to go. The problem with the back 9 is lack of space, many holes are the same shit, many are too close to the soccer fields, maybe set up a fence for those... Hole 15 was the only nice hole in the back 9, the only one I'd miss, but even it had problems. If you are going to set up such a hard tee shot, at least make sure there is some path towards the basket once you get out of it. My wife tossed my zombee over the fence into the farm land and there's barbed wire so you can't get it out, I had to get a really long stick to get it back. So maybe put up a bigger fence there or ask the farmer to cut one small section out so you can get your discs back.

In the end I'd recommend just scrapping the entire back 9, it's just not worth the risk of pegging a soccer mom in the back of the neck with a destroyer or tossing an $18 disc over a barbed wire fence that you can't get over. As I said, from now on I'll be playing the front 9 twice rather than even thinking about the back 9, it'll be a much better experience.

7 of 8 people found this review helpful.

Wide Open for Big Arms

2-4    12/28/2016   8/24/2015
Review By: KenanFlagler01
Played: 153  Reviewed: 149  Exp: 9.6 Years
This review was updated on 7/18/2019
10 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: If you don't have a big arm, this wide open but extremely long course will humble you, regardless of which tees you play from.

+ Open. There aren't many near-100% wide open courses like this in North Carolina. It's unique, in that sense. If you'd like to see what disc golf on a ball golf style course feels like, try this one. There's one truly wooded hole, #2, a tunnel hole between pine trees, with branches shaping the top of the tunnel and tree trunks forming the left and right walls. #15 also has some trees to contend with on the tee shot, then a few more guarding the basket. All other holes are open to wide open, with some treelines bordering one side of the fairway and a few well-positioned trees guarding a few baskets.

+ Alt tees. There are three sets of tees, Gold, Blue, and White. All are long, Gold exceptionally so.

+ Elevation. In addition to being long and open, there are a number of elevated tees that allow you to throw your disc out over an open expanse and watch the full flight in all its beauty. If you need to work on your power drive, there are few courses that compare to this one.

+ My favorite hole was #12. It has a very steep and tall embankment to the left and a treeline to the right, making it one of the few holes to this point on the course with a well-defined fairway. There are a few more holes with defined fairways coming down the home stretch--more on them in the cons section.
Cons: Here are my cons for Springwood:

- There are some afterthought holes. Holes 16 and 17 are complete throw away holes. They're much shorter than the rest of the course, only about 200 feet from the white tees, with a treeline bordering the right side of the fairway and a road on the left. Theses holes are right on the road, albeit a low traffic one, unless there are a lot park goers. These holes seemed to be placed here for no other reason than to connect the gigantic loop around the perimeter of the park.

- Par 6's?! I appreciate that not all courses are going to be the same. It's nice to have some tight, technical courses and some long, open ones. But this course just has distance for the sake of distance. Par 6 holes? Really? One of those par 6's is the worst hole on the course, in my opinion: #8. When you finish #7, there's a tee right beside the basket for #8. No sign. You can backtrack to a tee a little ways down the hill. That's the Gold tee and it does have a sign. From this, you can deduce that the unmarked tee is the Blues. Anyway, it's a par 6 with nowhere to throw to. The road is to the left. The "fairway" is down a steep embankment from the road and is impossibly narrow, overgrown, with thick brush and trees to the right. I didn't know how to approach this hole, so I kept walking and eventually came across the white tees. From here, it's a perfectly fine hole, but they have it as a par 5. It should be a par 3. Otherwise, I made my first ever eagle and my drive wasn't even that long.

- And more par 6's! #18 is another to complain about. You get to the tees, three sets again, and they're all par 6. I threw from the whites again. As I worked my way down the fairway, I see another tee. It's also for #18, all three layouts using this tee, and it denotes the hole as a par 3. Pretty confusing.

- No shade whatsoever. After the tunnel hole, #2, there is not one bit of shade on the rest of the course until you get to #15. It feels like an oasis of you're playing on a hot, sunny day like I did. But alas, it only lasts for a about 100 feet before you're back into the sun.

- Small tees. The tees are good quality, but they're too narrow and short, especially for such a long course where you may want a longer run-up to your drive.
Other Thoughts: One pro I didn't mention was proximity to I-40/85. This makes it a course I can see myself playing again if I'm traveling and have time to pull over to play. The problem is, the course is so long--with long walks in between some holes too--that it takes longer than a typical round of disc golf. I don't think Springwood is a bad course at all--it's good quality--but it's not for everybody. If you like the ball golf style of disc golf, this is a great course to try out.

10 of 10 people found this review helpful.


5+    5/11/2016   7/10/2014
Review By: JoeStewart
Played: 12  Reviewed: 4  Exp: 11.5 Years
This review was updated on 5/11/2016
4 Helpful / 8 Not
Pros: Changes have been made.
Cons: Those changes are not reflexed on this site.
Other Thoughts: hole 1. No Change
hole 2. No Change
hole 3. Has been split into holes 3 & 4 making it more playable for the average golfer. Short grass is still OB but there are no mandatories on either hole.
hole 4. new (see above statement)
hole 5. formally know as hole 4 is now 5 and the short 150' hole 5 is gone.
hole 6. no change
hole 7. no change
hole 8. the most changed hole on the course. You now play on the pad next to the entrance to the shelter parking lot for Blue and White the pin is now in the middle of the field adjacent to the Shelters. Much shorter than its original 1200 feet and more playable away from all the brush.
hole 9. no change
hole 10 - 16 no changes
hole 17 is really short now, due to the construction just to the right of that fairway. From the short pad it's pretty much a jump putt.
Hole 18. The was removed from its elevated flower box and moved closer to the Tee by around 10 or 15 feet.
There are some more changes on going but I'll update this again once those are in place.

4 of 12 people found this review helpful.

 Traveling Through

1    6/1/2014   6/25/2014
Review By: ShortBusDiscGolf
Played: 182  Reviewed: 9  Exp: 24.5 Years
5 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: I always stop and play golf while I am passing through towns on my journeys. You never know what you might find.......
Well, I liked how nice the park was. Very nice piece of property. Beautiful trees and softly rolling landscape at times. The tee pads are super solid, for concrete that is (I prefer rubber,..it's easier on the knees). This course had some really fun holes to play......Like #1.....Uphill & reachable w/ OB looming. This course requires a variety of shots. If you don't have a roller, GET ONE!
Cons: Duplicate holes everywhere. Loads of pedestrians. It took me over 3 hours to play because of non-golf foot traffic. Distance just for the sake of throwing far. Then trowing far again. And again.....then you can putt. This is not the type of park that I would use to introduce new players to the game. I would also not bring anyone rated over 925 here either. The latter will be bored and the former will be frustrated.
Other Thoughts: Moving some pin placements and/or tee pads would greatly help this course. I bet that the could fit a total of 20-22 holes at this park. I bet a tournament round would take 4 hours. I really appreciate the effort, but it needs some work.

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.

 Mental Toughness Required

5+    3/15/2014   4/15/2014
Review By: Ryan P.
Played: 56  Reviewed: 18  Exp: 13.6 Years
This review was updated on 9/17/2014
6 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: -The park is in a very nice area
-The course is different than most courses in the Greensboro/Burlington area (it is similar to the long positions at Cedarock, but not as open).
-There are a variety of shots you will need.
-The designers thought out the holes, and there are a variety of ways to play many holes.
-Nice park in a nice area
-All fairways (except part of hole 8) are very well-groomed.
Cons: -Requires waiting on/watching out for others on some holes (3, 4, and 13 come to mind)
-Drainage issues on some holes (the rough on 8-13 and parts of the fairway on each of those holes)
-OB and mandos are unclear. I realize they are for safety, and I usually dislike any OB/Mandos. I like these boundaries, but they should be clearer on the hole signs. I assume they would be marked for a tourney.
-Fairway on 8 isn't kept well on the hill running through the middle of the fairway.
Other Thoughts: -Not a course for beginners (this is neither a pro nor a con. However, if a beginner plays this course it will probably turn them off from disc golf or they will hurt someone and turn that person off from disc golf).
-I asked a lady what she thought about disc golf in the park, and she said that everyone has to share any public park, this one included.
-This course demands accuracy. If you don't throw accurate shots, you'll lose a disc (like me), end up OB, or get in the way of others. If you cannot throw accurate shots, or if you choose not to throw accurate shots, this isn't a course for you.
-If you're mentally prepared to throw shorter shots for the sake of accuracy, then come play the course.

6 of 6 people found this review helpful.

  Soccer Moms love Disc Golf

5+    3/5/2014   3/5/2014
Review By: 7771
Played: 96  Reviewed: 1
7 Helpful / 3 Not
Pros: -Championship lay out.
-Par ranges from a 2 to a 6
-Good workout from walking
-Cement pads and great tee signs
Cons: -Championship lay out unplayable most of the year.
-Just cus you call the short holes a par 2 or a long hole a par 6 doesnt change how people score on them
- lots and lots and lots of walking
-some tee pads seem to be pointed slightly off direction
-some holes are repeats back to back and are virtually the same holes 9 and 10 and holes 16 and 17
-Throwing booming shots into, at and around large groups of other park users
Other Thoughts: If you ever wanted to play a championship style course and have no consideration what so ever for the safety of the other park users look no further.

7 of 10 people found this review helpful.

  Not a good fit for the area

5+    11/12/2013   11/12/2013
Review By: nfs1989
Played: 1  Reviewed: 1
21 Helpful / 2 Not
Pros: I met with the designers when they were pouring the concrete and I overheard all of the good things that went into the idea of this course. A lot of good players/veterans of the sport did a lot of work here with the city to a get this course set in. The intensions of everyone involved were awesome and they told me they really want to make this a place where an event like Worlds would be held. The tees are beautiful, the score cards are amazing and most of the holes are definitely fun; if you want to know which ones then read other reviews. There is no point on beating the nail on the head here; we all know which holes are fun and which ones aren't.
Cons: Cons....haha it's obvious. It's so obvious that my jaw drops every time I'm reminded of the skilled players who came out here to verify the layout. How many people do you think can throw 400-500ft, dodge the abundant amount of mandos and OB's then drop the disc on a 10ft wide fair way all while not hitting any of the pedestrians? I like courses that add variety but the 1000ft long holes followed by short par 2's will hypothetically cause back up if there ever was a tournament on this course. Hole 18 still blows my mind, I understand the concept of placement but if I have to get into my putting stance on the tee so I can place it for my second shot...that's terrible.
Other Thoughts: I'm a power thrower and when I first heard about the distances of these holes I was excited. Let me also say, I've never left a review on this site until I played this course. To me this course was one of the biggest let downs to play and I fear for the damage it WILL cause to the sport of disc golf, specifically in the Burlington NC area. Recently disc golfers have left a very sour taste in Burlington's parks and rec department which has already cost us an amazing temp course at Cedarrock park. In a few more months, especially the next little league soccer season, you can expect a flurry of complaints from all the soccer moms out there. The extremely difficult and powerful throws right over or at children will end in injuries and arguments. I grew up in the area and I played soccer out here as a kid and I can assure you the parents of these children will not be kind to this. I love disc golf and the community but many of the participants decide that they can't play sober so they'll bring their vices here and think that it won't be a big deal because they do this at every park they play at. This park is different; you are mere feet away from children's games, sidelines, parents and officials. This will stir trouble and again, cause complaints, get the game removed from the park anyways and inhibit any other courses from being established in the area. So let me go ahead and say thanks in advance to those losers who will cause trouble for the rest of us. In regards to holes that are safety concerns, I think they can be fixed by rerouting so you're not throwing at or up against playing fields (seems like this should have been done the first time) and yes this may mean that you can't have a 1000ft hole but where does it say that you can't have fun on a hole if it's not 1000ft long? I do believe with some more serious work this course has potential to be fun for all level of players so that is why I still give it a 2.0 rating

21 of 23 people found this review helpful.

 Danger Danger Danger

1    11/10/2013   11/11/2013
Review By: BraveThrower43
Played: 457  Reviewed: 58  Exp: 8.6 Years
This review was updated on 5/13/2014
24 Helpful / 4 Not
Pros: I played the Gold course for this review but the Blue has many of the same issues.

The park is beautiful and well maintained. Great Athletic Complex.

The wind made it slightly more difficult.

There are a few decent holes.(probably 5-6)

Cons: There are some MAJOR safety and conflict concerns in this park. Between playing too close to ball fields and holes alongside roads it is a SERIOUS problem.

Mandos on holes such as 3 do not mask the issue of discs flying into the outfields. Just because a Mando is put up it does not mean a player will make the mando. And if they miss some of these light pole mandos their discs will land in the outfields.

The OB's and mandos(3) along with the landing zones on holes 3, 8, and 13 and a few others are not a good combo. For the distance required to throw on these holes the landing zones are not sufficient.

Hole 8 is a poor design in my opinion. Even with the hillside clear it will be a poor hole. Once again the landing zones+distance will be insufficient.

Hole 15 gold is a plinko fairway. yes there are gaps but they are more "lucky" gaps that are not realistic to hit over and over again.

If the pros ever played here(I doubt they ever will) they would be very critical of this course.

Ok now for the Par issue. Changing the par on a hole does not make the hole harder. it's just a number. When you change a short one to a par 2 or a 500 ft hole to a par 3 you are just arbitrarily saying "My course is harder" when it's really not. 90% of the field is still going to get 2's on the par 2's and 3's on the stupidly long par 3's. These are not bad par settings, they are bad holes. The scoring separation will just never happen. A gold level player will get the same score 99% of the time.

Hole 3's gold pad is almost in the fairway of hole 2. One tree kick and someones getting hit.......although it's so close I doubt anyone will be able to throw 2 while people are on 3's pad.

But even without the ball fields this course would not be a solid layout. There are just no OMG this is awesome holes.
Other Thoughts: I have doubts that this course will survive in it's current state. It is in major conflict with the rest of the park. I asked a few patrons in the park walking and watching us what they thought of the course and they said "we think it's dangerous". Not a good thing. As a Parks and Recreation professional I was appalled with the blatant disregard for safety in the design. This course was a major overreach. I'm not even 100% sure that disc golf is viable in this park since the useable land is so spread out throughout the park and is divided by large Athletic fields and other facilities. It might could be done with some longer transitions and a major scale down of the course distance and par.

This course would never be allowed to hold a worlds and honestly is not a true Gold level course. I have played Gold level and this is not it.

I would not recommend playing this course unless you are a courses played junky. Also avoid weekends if you are going to play. Baseball and softball will be played most weekends I would imagine.

24 of 28 people found this review helpful.

< Prev 1 2

Join Disc Golf Course Review for free to add your review. Have an account already? Sign In to add a review.