Fletcher, NC 
Crookston DGC Share
Uploaded By: DiscChainBasket18 Hole #8 (Taken 9/2009)
5 / 540ft.   3 / 540ft. Par / Distance:
Hole #8 Basket to Tee

 Share URL:

Course Rating Distribution

Reviews: 23
Avg. Rating:
Clear FiltersFilter/Sort
Reviews between: and Sort By:
Exp. (in years): Played: Reviewed: Only Trusted Reviewers
< Prev 1 2 3
not for me

1    9/8/2017   9/16/2017
Review By: Geodisc25
Played: 22  Reviewed: 5  Exp: 6.6 Years
This review was updated on 10/2/2017
Pros: Awesome park, amazing views!
good place to work on your long drives.
its a course
Cons: very long par threes, if you cant repeatedly throw 400ft then you wont have fun. Course was hard to navigate with a long of repetitive shots. very open not many obstacles. not many short more skillful shots. not much elevation change.
Other Thoughts: if you come out this way better off playing Jackson park or lake Julian. I probably wont play again.

Rough around the edges, with a few good qualities

1    4/24/2017   4/24/2017
Review By: Mike C
Played: 122  Reviewed: 53  Exp: 8.6 Years
2 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: + Amazing views. You're surrounded by beautiful mountains on basically every side. Gorgeous is an understatement.

+ Tons of long, open bombs. If you can throw 400'+, you will have a lot more fun, as otherwise you won't have much of a shot at scoring a 2 on these holes.

+ Wind at play.
Cons: - One glaring issue is the majority of the holes play along a busy walking path. There are holes like #4 that run parallel to it. I had to wait a full 5 minutes for some slow moving families and couples to clear out before I could throw.

- Hole #1 is a 450' RHBH hyzer line with a playground directly to the left of the basket. They should have placed the basket a bit further to the right for safety IMO. I had to walk over to a family and mention I wanted to throw a disc at the nearby basket, and if they wouldn't mind watching out for 30 seconds. Otherwise I would have felt unsafe throwing, going for the basket from the tee with a sharp edged distance driver.

- Hole #2's basket has a fallen cage.

- The baskets are old, single chain wall discatchers. They caught ok for me but spit-outs are more likely on single chain wall baskets.

- Too open. The walking path borders some woods that look like they could potentially offer some short, technical holes. As it stands the entire course is basically wide open field shots with baskets tucked along the edge of the woods. Only one hole, #3, really offers much in the way of obstacles.

- Slippery tees. They're gravel and they use small, round pebbles. I slipped on the first two tees, then opted to throw next to them in the grass the rest of my round.

- Listed pars are off. The course features level, 400-540' holes, and every hole is listed as a par 3. I think for a flat, wide open hole, 450' is about the limit for a par 3. Its not a big deal in the grand scheme of things but it caught my attention.

- The design won't appeal to the intended audience. This isn't a course that is likely to attract many 450'+ throwers, and the repetitive long distance + unrealistic pars will probably discourage players of average skill.
Other Thoughts: This is a strange course.

On one hand its a poorly designed course with old baskets, slippery tees, issues with park traffic and an apparently poor use of the available land. (Maybe there is a reason the woods were not used I am not aware of, these things happen).

On the other, the views are absolutely amazing and I have to admit I had fun ripping a bunch of big drives. Most courses in North Carolina are wooded, technical, and often somewhat shorter in length. This course reminded me of the back side of my first home course, Arboretum / Spiker in Ohio.

This isn't a course I can make a strong case for, yet despite its flaws I'm glad I played a round here. Bomber tee shots and beautiful views were enough to keep me entertained for 9 holes.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.

 Course Does Not Suit Park

1    8/16/2015   8/16/2015
Review By: S.Cann
Played: 149  Reviewed: 83  Exp: 8.6 Years
Pros: -I really was a fan of the hole design on most holes. They are all pretty long holes that force you to work for a 3. Despite being a mostly open course, they did a good job with what they had to work with.
-Despite being old single-chain DISCatchers, the baskets caught surprisingly well.
-The course was very well-manicured. The grass looked great and was cut short.
Cons: -My first advice to anyone playing this course is to either print or draw the course map as the layout and course transitions can be long and confusing.
-This course is in the middle of a busy park. Lots of runners, dog walkers, family reunions, etc.
-All of the designated undisturbed areas make losing a disc not only possible, but probable if you throw into the rough. Many holes set you up to lose a disc in this fashion as they are tucked into the tree line surrounded on all sides by terrible rough.
-The mando on hole8 is beyond absurd. To protect hole 7's tee they direct you to throw right at the much busier walking path and the rough covered in poison ivy.
-Speaking of poison ivy, this course had more of it than any course I have ever played and that's saying something. All the more reason to keep it on the fairway!
Other Thoughts: Overall, this is a reasonable course with some fun throws that allow you to rip some long drives. The course just doesn't suit the park. Being a busy community park I would generally expect a pitch-n-putt type course with some nice ace runs, but that was not the case at all. I really feel like with the land they had available they could've installed 18 solid holes instead of 9 solid holes spaced out between long transitions.

 Pretty Sorry

1    7/10/2015   7/10/2015
Review By: jeffboi
Played: 14  Reviewed: 14  Exp: 3.6 Years
3 Helpful / 1 Not
Pros: it exists?
Cons: i'm not sure how you make a 9 hole course that is played mostly in a field hard to navigate, but they did it. My wife hated it because it has 500 ft par 3s. Overall, they took discs and golf and made it completely un-fun.

3 of 4 people found this review helpful.

 Worth a look

1    6/25/2015   7/5/2015
Review By: ibcleary
Played: 23  Reviewed: 2  Exp: 6.2 Years
Pros: -A nice place close to town to throw distance.
-Between mando's and the rough they force just about every tee shot with good distance.
-Even with the open course layout they still have a few interesting pin locations.

Cons: -It was busy with walkers on the path, even on a Thursday morning.
-Tee pads blow.
-Was able to find my way with the map in media files, but I could see hpow it could be an issue.
-If your not out to work on distance, you might not have a good time
Other Thoughts: I wasn't going to review this course, bu tI thought a 1.5 rating was a little harsh. I gave it a 2.5 because of the pros. Close to town and Hendersonville. Interesting long tee shots.

 Wear long Pants!

2-4    10/11/2013   10/14/2013
Review By: Bowman101
Played: 6  Reviewed: 3
0 Helpful / 1 Not
Pros: Great long shots that really test your arm
Cons: Poison ivy everywhere.
Difficult to find tees
Near parking lots
Near playgrounds
Other Thoughts: This course was fun to me because its a new course and it allowed me to drive it as far as I can. The holes are almost always around 3-400 feet away from the tees, which are extremely hard to find. Also you better be great with your drives because the woods full of poison ivy. Another thing is that the holes are near/on a walking path and a picnic area, so at one time a woman came down and sat in the middle of the fairway which was difficult. Even though it only has nine holes, I only parred the second one. I ended up with nine over when I played because of the difficulty and there was a strong wind. My advice when playing is to play with all of But overall I had a fun time.

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.

 Busy park but still fun

1    7/16/2013   7/22/2013
Review By: madcow
Played: 28  Reviewed: 10  Exp: 8.1 Years
1 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: open layout (not counting trails)
distance shots
varying left/right baskets
Cons: Planned out around walking trails
shots are basically the same
long shots (for those who cant throw far)
if i recall tees were non-existent
hard to find hole 2 tee off
Other Thoughts: Over all i liked this course, if it was on a day that it wasnt busy.

This would probably be a home course for me if i lived in the area. Great for practicing throws as the layout is pretty open for most of the holes.

Like i said tho, downside is it the trails/paths. People were everywere.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.


1    5/28/2013   5/28/2013
Review By: MattyIce
Played: 39  Reviewed: 3  Exp: 9.1 Years
1 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: fairways are kept short.....that's it
Cons: If your disc even thinks about going int the rough, you might as well kiss it goodbye. Bushes and bushes of poison ivy and honey suckle make it pretty much impossible to find or retrieve discs.
Everything is way to close to the walking trails, and most of the people in this park are older so they have no idea what you are doing or do they care at all.
Other Thoughts: very sub par course for the potential that this park probably has.
Whoever designed it took no account as to keeping it away from high traffic areas I.e. throwing over roads, over picnic tables, over walking paths, or next to areas that you aren't allowed to go in if your discs do stray.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.

 Bad Layout

1    10/10/2012   10/12/2012
Review By: JimDK27
Played: 34  Reviewed: 11  Exp: 8.5 Years
4 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: I liked the baskets and tee pads. It was easy to follow the layout after hole 2. The grass is kept short also. The tee signs are good for a general idea of the hole. It is also a good course to practice rollers on because of the open fairways with well trimmed grass.
Cons: The layout is to close to the walking trails for most of the course. Hole 3 even has a basket in the middle of a walking path. I had to keep checking to be sure no one was walking towards the basket on that hole and it is by far the worst. You can't see far up the trail from the tee and runner could easily end up in the path of your disc after you have thrown. The hazard wasn't marked well for number 7 either. The water on the left side of the hole is deep and muddy and you can't see any thing past the surface. The course is lacking in variety, but this is because they don't have much to work with because of the walking trails through the woods.
Other Thoughts: I think that if layout was tweaked on a few holes the course would be safer for the walkers and runners using the trails. I don't see the course getting more than nine holes because it seems that it is restricted to the back half of the park and the park isn't very large. I still can't grasp how hole 3 was approved by the park. Maybe the walking trail came later but I doubt it.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.

 A giant football field with a disc golf course.

2-4    6/29/2012   7/26/2012
Review By: Bennybennybenny
Played: 113  Reviewed: 111  Exp: 6.7 Years
This review was updated on 8/21/2013
2 Helpful / 0 Not
Pros: -This course is at Fletcher state park and it's very pretty. It's fair because for recreational players because three of the holes are considered par 5's for recreational players. If you are one of those players who throws over 400+. You probably would want to play the real way considering every hole a par 3.
-#9 is definitely the best on the course. Although I don't like the wetlands at Brevard, I really like that they are to the left of the fairway. Once you go past the wetlands, the fairway goes left. On days after heavy rains, the wetlands are gone and it's fun to try to bomb you drive over the pond.
-Every hole allows you to bomb a big drive and that is fun. You will possibly have your longest birdie hole here. This is good for a warm up round for the big arm players.
-Grass is cut and the fairways are groomed.
-There are trashcans on the course and bathrooms as well.
Cons: -In my opinion, I think the tees that are just rocks are not good.
-The holes are kinda long, there is a lot more land and if some holes get a bit shortened. The course would be better and could possibly be 18.
-I did say in the pros the grass is cut, but on the greens it's tall and you could lose a disc.
-All the holes are too open and long, there are no ace runs or wooded holes. No variety here either, it's all flat and open and long.
-Hole 3 is too close to the parking lot. It needs to be moved and there are cars parked in front of #3's tee. Sidearm or you will have to pay for car repairment.
-The mando on 8 on the telephone pole needs to go. On 8 you throw right of it. Forget the stupid mando, the woods are a bit thick. They share a mando. Stupid idea, don't play it. A good example of a good mando are the ones at Bradley Center in Gastonia. If you want to know an awful mando, you can find it here.
-There are people driving past hole #2 looking for a parking spot.
-Lack of wooded holes as well. This is just a course basically to have long drive challenges or something which it would be fun for.
-The course has the running trail on it. Watch out for runners who are in the way.
Other Thoughts: Crookston isn't a bad course but it needs major improvement. I did like hole #9 a lot and found that probably as the best on the course. There are a few decent holes here and they do allow big drives which you can't go wrong with on open holes. I don't think a disc golf course should be this long and be on a state park. People eat lunch here, they jog, fish, play baseball or football or play on they playground. The course takes a lot of space and some holes should be shortened.

Hole by hole.
#1. Decent starting hole, it's pretty long and you go over the pavement after about 200' feet and small trees are in play past the pavement. This is a pretty good starting hole.
#2. A fail, there are cars roaming by and people jog on this hole it's also close to the road. Should be shortened and moved closer to #3's tee.
#3. Bad tee design but the basket location isn't bad. Grass should be cut on the green though. Sidearm since it goes right. Needs to be shorter because hitting a car is possible.
#4. Not bad but needs to be cleared out to the right and on the green. Sidearm to the left. The green goes a bit right.
#5. Very tough once you get to the green, it's got trees around it. The hole does allow a big drive but it's not a pleasing one.
#6. It's long but has no challenge. It's way too open but it's not too bad. You can bomb a nice big one out there.
#7. Awful, the mando has got to go. It would be a great hole without it.
#8. Would have been good if it didn't have the mando, you go right of it and if it goes badly right, you are in the overgrowth. Besides that, the hole is okay and the wetlands are to the left.
#9. Great finishing hole. The design is brilliant. The wetlands make it a nice challenging hole, but you can still bomb a nice drive.

Crookston is good for the big arms but don't go there if you are a beginner. The course is for at least intermediates. I mainly agree with heelboycraig's review. Go to Richmond. I hear it's much better and actually has hills. Or Waynesville, it has a bunch a cool teeshots. This is completely flat and long. I have no problem with the distance but none of the holes are fun except #9. It ends very well. James Nichols has many better courses than this.
-This course is too open. It felt like playing on a football field. No signature holes here, maybe #9 when there is a recent rainfall.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.

< Prev 1 2 3

Join Disc Golf Course Review for free to add your review. Have an account already? Sign In to add a review.
Disc Golf Center