SonicGuy
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,827
I don't think so. Dude keeps it tight and trim.
Primary color stretch pants. Tight and trim is technically correct I guess...
I don't think so. Dude keeps it tight and trim.
Primary color stretch pants. Tight and trim is technically correct I guess...
I find it a bit funny that you think McBeth is poorly dressed, when he basically set the dress code trends for the sport. Try to go back 5 years and find someone wearing golf pants, it ain't really there.
I don't think anyone is debating that as a whole disc golfers have a terrible style. No matter how you slice it Kohls sheek just looks bad.
By all means, please regale us with your ideal dress code, ProjectRunwayGuy.
Primary color stretch pants. Tight and trim is technically correct I guess...
I would think a lot of PGA golfers would wear shorts if they were allowed... especially when its stupid hot
I've got some Adidas golf pants though that are unbelievably breathable though. Textile technology be crazy.
Climo had it on lock in the 90s. Those tight ankled swishy pants with a tucked in polo was top notch. If you want to see how much disc golf has evolved from a professionalism perspective - go watch the 93 worlds on Youtube. Hilarious stuff.
That's the one with the guy in unitard shorts, right?
Oh yea, and a flash of a woman in a full body multicolored leotard.
Worth looking at?
Asking for a friend...
A few thoughts to get back on track.
1. Patreon is the BEST way to support your favorite channels. But I think that our current teams are not utilizing it to the best of their ability or capability. I support Jomez and CCDG and nothing bothers me more than the end of the month getting 30 messages when they both suddenly submit all their videos to get paid. It feels like an afterthought and "cash grab". Use Patreon as a way to notify your best supporters that videos are available immediately. I have always said that they should be using Patreon as an incentive. SCREW NEXT DAY COVERAGE. Give the people that support you the leg up and give ONLY THEM next day coverage. Everyone else should get it 4 or 5 days later. That will drive up the incentive for people to support them. Unfortunately I don't think that will happen because they are fearful of alienating their base. This is why SmashBoxx is providing the SmashCutts to their audience, commercial free the night of the event, ONLY FOR PATRONS (free). It might only get 20-30 views, but those people are the people that we want to please the MOST.
2. I love that the manufacturers are getting involved and helping out the crews. But they are also holding the entire media back by restricting access to events based on WHO is supporting "rival" crews. I don't think that we are not in a position to turn away free media for our largest events. And if CCDG wants to cover LVC, or Masters Cup, or GBO, or ANY NT of Major at no cost to the event, they should be allowed to. Or IF SmashBoxx wanted to show up on OUR OWN DIME to NTs and Majors, we should be allowed to attend. These are the PDGA's biggest events and restricting media access to them isn't the way we should be approaching this.
3. Paul is dressed just fine. Jees.
A few thoughts to get back on track.
...2. ... And if CCDG wants to cover LVC, or Masters Cup, or GBO, or ANY NT of Major at no cost to the event, they should be allowed to. Or IF SmashBoxx wanted to show up on OUR OWN DIME to NTs and Majors, we should be allowed to attend. These are the PDGA's biggest events and restricting media access to them isn't the way we should be approaching this.
...
I disagree with this.
TD's are allowed to restrict media access to an event just like they can restrict vendor access to an event. If the TD does not want CCDG or SmashBoxx to provide media coverage for the event, then you all don't get to cover the event. End of story! No whining allowed.
Smashboxx trying to cover an event without permission is no different than the disc golf vendor that parks down the street from tournament central and sells discs across the street from Hole 14 without permission. Actually, the rogue vendor doesn't even "sell" stuff, he takes "donations" for discs and snacks or water. While that rogue vendor may be very experienced and may be providing something that everyone wants, the TD has every right not to allow that vendor at the event. (Reference: Am Worlds 2007)
A TD does not need any reason to allow or disallow vendors or "media vendors" at an event. It doesn't matter if the TD paid the vendor or the vendor paid the TD or there weren't any other vendors at the event. It doesn't matter if the rogue media vendor was willing to get there on "HIS OWN DIME".