Gennataos
Eagle Member
I've started up a putter league and want to steer the disc choices away from utility discs like the Zone. I want it to be about shaping lines with a putter, not pulling off trick shots with skips, overhands, rollers, etc. Something like a Wizard or Aviar is what I have in mind for people to use.
While I know ratings and whatnot can be very subjective, I'm using the inbounddiscgolf site as a reference, because I want some sort of unbiased source to define where the cutoff lies. The best way I've come up with to do that is sort by Putt & Approach Disc Type, then Net (greatest to least). My ideal cutoff would be anything with greater Net fade than a Wizard (31%) would be out. However, looking at the long list of putters with 36% Net fade, I see very little in that list which I would characterize as a utility disc. Above that, though, starting with the JOKERi, is where discs venture into the utility disc range.
I don't want to just pick and choose known utility discs, because then people start saying, "Well, I can do the same thing with a champing Rhyno!", etc. What do you think? Is this a fair way to approach this?
While I know ratings and whatnot can be very subjective, I'm using the inbounddiscgolf site as a reference, because I want some sort of unbiased source to define where the cutoff lies. The best way I've come up with to do that is sort by Putt & Approach Disc Type, then Net (greatest to least). My ideal cutoff would be anything with greater Net fade than a Wizard (31%) would be out. However, looking at the long list of putters with 36% Net fade, I see very little in that list which I would characterize as a utility disc. Above that, though, starting with the JOKERi, is where discs venture into the utility disc range.
I don't want to just pick and choose known utility discs, because then people start saying, "Well, I can do the same thing with a champing Rhyno!", etc. What do you think? Is this a fair way to approach this?