Why does "smooth = far"?

When you realize that the US is a bunch of countries banded together to form a union, and the union leadership who is in charge of defending the union and making sure trade between the states stays correct has somehow turned into "oh were just one country and we control you all."

That's the issue.

I mean, we can relate this to disc golf as a whole.

When we throw and throw smooth, the more parts of our body we use in unison the more powerful we are.
If we just throw with our arm, were not very powerful.
Our country was designed and setup for every state to stay autonomous but work together to form a perfect union.

Which is what we want to do for nice clean throws.
The more we can stay in harmony overall with our body and not over exaggerate or try and dictate from one spot, the better we can throw and move. A lot of people struggle with this and throw with the arm.

This is how you can really see the smooth swings, good brace and let the body crash through.
Keep your hand slightly on the wheel and guide the disc in the correct direction and dont collapse.
 
Mostly because...jank is not far.

You are much more likely to lose useful acceleration/speed by introducing a little bit of jank, than you are to lose it with a little bit of slowing the eff down.

A methodical but in-tact kinetic chain is actually surprisingly fast in the end, it just doesn't 'feel' like you put tons of effort in.

I think 'smooth is far' is a mantra that helps new players, as well as describes the most advanced possible swings pros have.
 
I am pretty sure that Sheep meant to post his gibberish here.

https://www.dgcoursereview.com/threads/conspiracy-theories.129770/

Dude simply says stuff. No attention to veracity, honesty or truth. He needs to develop his posting to include:
IMO, I believe, it seems to me, from my perspective, my take is..., I think, another opinion is....
The only poster that felt so free to post conjecture, supposition and innuendo, as fact/truth, was Casey, lol.

Well, we do know that the Peer Review process is absolute bunk. That has been proven very thoroughly.
JFC.
 
I am pretty sure that Sheep meant to post his gibberish here.

https://www.dgcoursereview.com/threads/conspiracy-theories.129770/

Dude simply says stuff. No attention to veracity, honesty or truth. He needs to develop his posting to include:
IMO, I believe, it seems to me, from my perspective, my take is..., I think, another opinion is....
The only poster that felt so free to post conjecture, supposition and innuendo, as fact/truth, was Casey, lol.


JFC.
Do you just get butthurt and angry when I speak?

Such a sad person.
 
Nice writeup @BenjiHeywood it made the whip analogy much clearer to me.

What trips me up is the opposite of smooth, and its often called muscling. Obviously in a smooth throw all sorts of muscles are involved in an intricate timeline including relaxing them at the appropriate time (for example arms and shoulders are relaxed at the peak of the backswing) and contracting them again. Even a smooth thrower cant throw max distance all day. Muscling is really just breaking the chain either by contracting a muscle at the wrong spot in the sequence of a throw or not relaxing it in the first place. Maybe the better alternative is to just call it stiff throwing and stiff throwers might also hold static cues for their throw in their mind, thereby making them stiffer.

All the curves Sewer Bill posted is how I imagine the muscle tone in a throw works. Muscles going from relaxed to contracted in a manner that is impossible to consciously control and if everything works out, a smooth throw is achieved.

From personal experience, my shots feel the smoothest when I stretched the day before and that stretching includes some exercises for the rotator cuff, some for hips and some for legs. Maybe stretching the day before helps with keeping the muscles relaxed. And in smooth throws I would also feel the dynamic loading in a throw the most like feeling the drive side stretched out and the resistance of the brace against the mass im throwing into it.
 
Last edited:
Nice writeup @BenjiHeywood it made the whip analogy much clearer to me.

What trips me up is the opposite of smooth, and its often called muscling. Obviously in a smooth throw all sorts of muscles are involved in an intricate timeline including relaxing them at the appropriate time (for example arms and shoulders are relaxed at the peak of the backswing) and contracting them again. Even a smooth thrower cant throw max distance all day. Muscling is really just breaking the chain either by contracting a muscle at the wrong spot in the sequence of a throw or not relaxing it in the first place. Maybe the better alternative is to just call it stiff throwing and stiff throwers might also hold static cues for their throw in their mind, thereby making them stiffer.

All the curves Sewer Bill posted is how I imagine the muscle tone in a throw works. Muscles going from relaxed to contracted in a manner that is impossible to consciously control and if everything works out, a smooth throw is achieved.

From personal experience, my shots feel the smoothest when I stretched the day before and that stretching includes some exercises for the rotator cuff, some for hips and some for legs. Maybe stretching the day before helps with keeping the muscles relaxed. And in smooth throws I would also feel the dynamic loading in a throw the most like feeling the drive side stretched out and the resistance of the brace against the mass im throwing into it.

You can argue there is a difference between stiff throwing, ala, low mobility throwing, vs muscling throwing.

Muscling has a lot to do with over use of the muscles in general in the throw, not only at wrong times, but in low amounts vs large amounts.

So, a good powerful smooth throw, lets make up some numbers, is using 50 different muscles to apply leverage to the disc, while a muscled throw might be using 10-15 muscles.
Lets assume were applying the same amount of force overall with those 2 throws.
You're gonna gas out quick.

The idea of applying a load over many muscles is what we want to do to stay fresh, loose and relaxed, but also allows us to generate more force with less effort.
When we muscle, were essentially throwing with the arm and a few shoulder muscles. As we are trying to contract all these muscles to be big and strong and powerful, we reduce mobility to a level that is not suitable for speed and leverage.

This is why it drives me nuts though people with just atrocious muscled form and they still are somehow able to throw far/well, and play for some level of time.
But I really do wonder how much their shoulder hurts the next day.

At one point when I was on my disc golf learning journey I was there.
I kept blowing my shoulder out though because I have a really old injury in my right shoulder. I was throwing 400 feet back then.
I'm lucky to throw 350 a lot of times now, but I can throw all day. And the next day and the next day.
It's pretty easy to gas people out endurance wise over time now, they can't keep up.


So, taking that rambling of whatever to the next spot.
When we muscle and use less muscles to generate that power, were usually using them out of sequence for starters, but were using them so out of sequence, by the time we are supposed to engage them, they are tired. Disc golf is about fast twitch muscle use if were talking about efficient powerful form, not muscled form like brodie/ezra. 2 different categories of throwing.

So, less muscles, overworked, being used out of order, over stressed to generate not a lot of mobility and flexibility because they are clenched tight. I think i'm repeating myself, i'm not going back to review this before hitting post.

While in a smooth more efficient throw using as many muscle groups as we can, we can lower effort, increase mobility and flexibility and this also allows us to keep the muscles out of strain allowing us to fire the fast twitch muscles in the correct order to achieve maximum efficiency, even if we dont throw far, like me, but were able to casually throw with no effort.

And to be honest.
I really really enjoy no effort golfing. It's far more fun to hit lines even if you dont throw far. Though.. it is nice to throw 450+ sometimes. And.. Some days I can. but rarely.
 
Reading this thread is interesting, because one of my actual breakthroughs was getting past the 'don't user your arm or muscles!' mantra.

This is good advice for new players, but you have to leave it behind to really throw with some speed. I disagree that a max distance huck is truly 'effortless'. There is AMPLE room for grunt inducing power that is still timed correctly, it is just not easy to start there and actually do it right.

So if you are still heavily emphasizing a lack of effort or limp arm concept, but have spent a lot of time on a swing...try bending those rules a bit and see where you get :)

/not advocating for going backwards in technique, just saying that I think the concept of 'effortless' distance can be taken too literally.
 
Last edited:
Reading this thread is interesting, because one of my actual breakthroughs was getting past the 'don't user your arm or muscles!' mantra.

This is good advice for new players, but you have to leave it behind to really throw with some speed. I disagree that a max distance huck is truly 'effortless'. There is AMPLE room for grunt inducing power that is still timed correctly, it is just not easy to start there and actually do it right.

So if you are still heavily emphasizing a lack of effort or limp arm concept, but have spent a lot of time on a swing...try bending those rules a bit and see where you get :)

/not advocating for going backwards in technique, just saying that I think the concept of 'effortless' distance can be taken too literally.
Not sure I would call it a limp arm, its just not something I give any thought and it just does what it does. At least when my form is going well, right now its a mess and I think about the arm :D

Me and my friends used to egg each other on to throw with more hate. As you can imagine, it went sideways. The hate-throwing-technique included volatile arm-flinging and is the opposite of smooth.

How do you use your grunt power to make the disc go fly further? Is it just a mental cue to put a bit more juice into it, or is it like shaolin punching your arm through?
 
I think it's much about trying hard at the very start of the pull through vs. the very end of the fling. Anything to get you to the point you are thinking about release angle and apex rather than the brace and mechanics.
 
You accelerate into the throw. It should seem effortless. It's a smooth acceleration. Alot of people end up decelerating into the throw and lose a ton of power.
 
Reading this thread is interesting, because one of my actual breakthroughs was getting past the 'don't user your arm or muscles!' mantra.

This is good advice for new players, but you have to leave it behind to really throw with some speed. I disagree that a max distance huck is truly 'effortless'. There is AMPLE room for grunt inducing power that is still timed correctly, it is just not easy to start there and actually do it right.

So if you are still heavily emphasizing a lack of effort or limp arm concept, but have spent a lot of time on a swing...try bending those rules a bit and see where you get :)

/not advocating for going backwards in technique, just saying that I think the concept of 'effortless' distance can be taken too literally.

This is the trouble people struggle with.

You'll naturally throw further with loose guided form. But, the key thing you said there is "max distance" and that wasn't necessarily what is being referenced in that part of the explanation.

Max distance is learning to dial back to gain maximum efficiency, then adding the juice in at the right time of the swing.
So you're not wrong with what youre explaining in the end of what you say there. I'm being a bit pedantic about how you're telling the overall picture of what is being spoke about.

A lot of the largest breakthroughs I get with students is basically beating them with a ruler over and over again to get them to "stop trying so hard" and suddenly they will gain 50-80 feet of distance over their "max power" throw by just kinda casually throwing.

The body has to be able to work and flow. Its a dance, not a power lifting competition.
But when we get there, the elegance of power is the last part of the deadlift. You got the bar at your chest and timing that last squat and push to get that bar above your head. That's the point were looking for to get that max distance. So its not that we dont ever wanna use muscles, it's just.. to be honest. Unexplainable about when or how to engage the muscles in the last part of the throw.

I've been trying to figure it out for years now. And sometimes I can throw 450 feet. Most of the time I'm happy with my 300-350. My fast twitch engagement might suck,, or my timing is wrong. or both.
 
This is the trouble people struggle with.

You'll naturally throw further with loose guided form. But, the key thing you said there is "max distance" and that wasn't necessarily what is being referenced in that part of the explanation.

Max distance is learning to dial back to gain maximum efficiency, then adding the juice in at the right time of the swing.
So you're not wrong with what youre explaining in the end of what you say there. I'm being a bit pedantic about how you're telling the overall picture of what is being spoke about.

A lot of the largest breakthroughs I get with students is basically beating them with a ruler over and over again to get them to "stop trying so hard" and suddenly they will gain 50-80 feet of distance over their "max power" throw by just kinda casually throwing.

The body has to be able to work and flow. Its a dance, not a power lifting competition.
But when we get there, the elegance of power is the last part of the deadlift. You got the bar at your chest and timing that last squat and push to get that bar above your head. That's the point were looking for to get that max distance. So its not that we dont ever wanna use muscles, it's just.. to be honest. Unexplainable about when or how to engage the muscles in the last part of the throw.

I've been trying to figure it out for years now. And sometimes I can throw 450 feet. Most of the time I'm happy with my 300-350. My fast twitch engagement might suck,, or my timing is wrong. or both.
Ya I agree :)

I specified max distance because...lets be honest most people want to throw far and throwing far is where lots of things have to kind of come together.

I won't argue at all against 300' being almost literally effortless. And there are quite a few variations in swings that can produce that distance with no real exertion.

My only real point is that for me personally, I bought into 'effortless' too literally and you absolutely can add power to the disc at the right time, and it added a good amount to my max drive. It also increased my accuracy because there is a more pronounced feeling of the weight of the disc.

I feel like I recall a lot of stuff in the "Free floating arm moment" thread that would be close to what my brain is currently wanting to say now.
 
Ya I agree :)

I specified max distance because...lets be honest most people want to throw far and throwing far is where lots of things have to kind of come together.

I won't argue at all against 300' being almost literally effortless. And there are quite a few variations in swings that can produce that distance with no real exertion.

My only real point is that for me personally, I bought into 'effortless' too literally and you absolutely can add power to the disc at the right time, and it added a good amount to my max drive. It also increased my accuracy because there is a more pronounced feeling of the weight of the disc.

I feel like I recall a lot of stuff in the "Free floating arm moment" thread that would be close to what my brain is currently wanting to say now.

It's also remembering its a process.

There are a few ways to throw far, but were ignoring the smash method, which some people can just do, but was referenced in here.

Most of the distance stuff is a throw further by dialing back thing which is the originality of the topic in here. But you're right, over time when that form comes together, you can learn how to give it more but still be giving it less.

People really can't fathom not trying hard to do more. It's hard for your brain to even think it. "i need to throw this relaxed and easy to throw 380" .. your brain is like "dude, thats far, rip it" and you throw it 250.

It's so counter intuitive to every other sport movement because of the way were generating power. Every other sport we are using a club of some sort to leverage into something else, we are shortening the chain on disc golf and the only lever is us and we dont have as much wrist use to generate the speed either.
 
Top