Pros:
_Orange Prodigy Baskets
_Nice informative tee signs
_Kiosk with aerial course map
_Directional signs all over the place!
_2 Huge, textured triangular tees on every hole with a red stained follow through area to prevent erosion
_36 wood benches
_Beautifully done rock work around multiple tee pads and baskets
_Multiple elevated baskets (con if you're not into this)
_Water in play on a few holes
_Beautiful park setting
_Championship* quality from the long tees
_Great use of elevation
_Mix of open and wooded holes
_Huge variety between shorts/long tees
_Multiple pin placements on every hole with a ton of variety
_Excellent flow with some nicely done trails in spots they are needed
Cons:
_Some holes with small diameter trees directly in the middle of the fairway that create some randomness/luck well down the fairway
_13 and 16 are ehhhh as they stand from the longs
_Some of the Par 3s from the longs are sub 400 feet but have shot shapes that really play like short Par 4s (it was mostly short placements when I played, so this is context dependent
Other Thoughts:
OK, so my overall thought on New Melle Lakes is it's far and away the best course in St. Charles County and the volunteers did some amazing work. I played the grand opening and was astonished at how "finished" this course was with the tees, benches, signs, mulch, trails, etc. It was seriously impressive. There are so many great holes and the fun factor is through the roof. Make no mistake, I LOVE IT. I also enjoy a good day of scrambling, and New Melle Lakes gives you that if you play the longs.
My reviews are always in the context of how a course plays in a competitive format. Because I like to compete, and I want this area to have a course that could host an NT/Major/DGPT even down the road. This means I'm a purist when it comes to reducing luck by way of distinct fairways. I love difficult. I especially love difficult in the woods, but I don't want the difficulty to come from randomness. For me, the only thing keeping this course from a 4.5-5 is the luck factor on a handful of holes/spots. It's a bit disappointing because the holes themselves - the shot shapes, and vision from the designer are excellent. It's just a few trees here and there, that IMO, obviously create randomness. As a general example, there are instances when a perfect shot shape has to be thrown through a beautifully tight tunnel through the woods and then 200-300 feet up the fairway, in that beautiful tunnel stands 1, or a few trees that simply cannot be accounted for off the tee. It's a matter of luck in spots, pure and simple.
Please don't misunderstand this review. I'm being extremely nitpicky because clean fairways are at the top of my review hierarchy. I realize that is not the same for everyone. In fact, every single person I have heard from while playing and after has had nothing but excellent things to say about it.
The course designers did say that the course is brand new and it needs some time to "break in" and I did get the feeling that they were open to some minor changes, but I was personally told by the main man that it would likely stay as is for at least a year, which is perfectly fine. "breaking in" is a term used when referring to underbrush and what not on a new course. Trees don't break in. They get cut down, or maybe die after a decade or so of getting hammered by discs (small ones). Because this course is soooooo close to elite, I really hope the chainsaw comes out. No disrespect to the trees of course. We all need firewood.