primal dg
Eagle Member
How fast do discs travel? Like how fast does a monster drive go. A midrange shot?
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
interesting to see some of those distances at the lower speeds
Here's a chart from a study done on the correlation of distance and disc speed:
Do you have any more info with this? Like a legend? It seems helpful but it just doesn't seem all there.
It comes from here
"The speed of the disc is shown on the horizontal axis. The chart shows a good correlation between speed and distance. For example, a disc thrown correctly and efficiently at a speed of 50 mph is likely to travel about 300 feet. Reaching a distance of 400 feet or more requires a disc speed of around 70 to 75 mph. The circled group of plots seems to be a slight anomaly. It shows a group of discs that traveled a long distance, but with a slower disc speed. This might be attributed to the amount of spin imparted on the disc, the height that it was thrown, and wind direction. Increased angular momentum (spin) will help keep the disc stable and aloft for a longer period of time.
The weight and model of discs thrown varied from player to player. This factor also contributed to how fast a disc was thrown, and how far it glided. The most popular weights of disc used by the professionals in this study were 165 grams (11%), 172 grams (10%), 174 grams (14%), and 175grams (17%). The disc models that flew the farthest were the Discraft Xtra, Innova Teebird , Discraft XL, and Innova Eagle.
Additional speed and distance measurements were taken using amateur players. Table 1 gives the disc golfer an idea about the level of expertise needed to play in a particular division."
So I'm guessing these speeds are shortly after the disc is released. I know it'd be difficult to measure, but I think it would be cool to see a graph of the speed of a disc over the course of its flight.
Mash, can you provide a link or cite the source of that graph? I'd love to know more about what the data points actually represent. I wonder if they might be different molds thrown at vrious speeds. Obviously, the circled portion merits attention: more D with less V... noodle arms rejoice!Here's a chart from a study done on the correlation of distance and disc speed:
Dist Speed Weight Disc First Name Last Name
528 48 176 XL Steve Rico
498 52 175 TeeBird Ken Jarvis
456 49 175 Eagle Ken Jarvis
465 52 147 Firebird Aaron Weild
546 62 174 Eagle Christian Sandstrum
447 51 171 Eagle Ed Doppelmayr
480 55 173 Eagle Sam Ferrans
408 47 175 Eagle Sam Ferrans
456 53 175 Eagle Sam Ferrans
489 58 174 Eagle Christian Sandstrum
435 52 173 TeeBird Gibson Hollub
387 47 172 TeeBird Mike Werth
393 48 176 XL Steve Rico
429 53 166 XL Steve Rico
267 33 174 JLS Jay Townshend
450 56 175 Eagle Ken Jarvis
417 52 171 Viper Kurt Karlsson
Those 500'+ throws at low recorded speeds are highly inaccurate for their distance and the throwers. My guess is they were thrown so high that the radar gun didn't catch their actual speed on an upward trajectory. They might have been going only 50 linearly, but guaranteed those disc were going 70mph+ on an upward angle. Randy Wimm probably.Here is a sample of the throws with the highest distance-to-speed ratio:
Code:Dist Speed Weight Disc First Name Last Name 528 48 176 XL Steve Rico 498 52 175 TeeBird Ken Jarvis 456 49 175 Eagle Ken Jarvis 465 52 147 Firebird Aaron Weild 546 62 174 Eagle Christian Sandstrum 447 51 171 Eagle Ed Doppelmayr 480 55 173 Eagle Sam Ferrans 408 47 175 Eagle Sam Ferrans 456 53 175 Eagle Sam Ferrans 489 58 174 Eagle Christian Sandstrum 435 52 173 TeeBird Gibson Hollub 387 47 172 TeeBird Mike Werth 393 48 176 XL Steve Rico 429 53 166 XL Steve Rico 267 33 174 JLS Jay Townshend 450 56 175 Eagle Ken Jarvis 417 52 171 Viper Kurt Karlsson
There are additional data points on the graph that didn't have a disc weight recorded. I can tell you the 540ft at 49mph was also an XL, but it was by somebody named "Randy" without a last name recorded.