You can barely see a small deer tick even when it's in plain sight on your arm, let alone your bunghole.
Indeed, deer ticks are challenging to find, but they typically go for the easiest place on the body to latch on to. They typically don't travel much unless poor blood flow at the initial site is had. I agree, the best way is to use repellent, but it is not entirely necessary if an excellent tick check is had. Also, the best way to not get a tick in your bungholeis to not shove tall grass and weeds in there to begin with
lots of people don't get the rash
Indeed, the rate of rash reporting is variable and likely depends on the vigilance of search as well as place of bite. However, I gather from the best studies that the rate of rash with meaningful disease afterwards is around 75%
Indeed, deer ticks are challenging to find, but they typically go for the easiest place on the body to latch on to. They typically don't travel much unless poor blood flow at the initial site is had. I agree, the best way is to use repellent, but it is not entirely necessary if an excellent tick check is had. Also, the best way to not get a tick in your bungholeis to not shove tall grass and weeds in there to begin with
lots of people don't get the rash
Indeed, the rate of rash reporting is variable and likely depends on the vigilance of search as well as place of bite. However, I gather from the best studies that the rate of rash with meaningful disease afterwards is around 75%