- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 2,776
I was amazed to see Seatac rated as a 4. In June I tried to play there, but after 3 holes of waist deep grass I gave up. The reviewer says it's poorly maintained, and to avoid playing there 3 months per year b/c of that. How can a course like that rate a 4? I guess that's based on the course at it's best, but I think the overall status should be taken into account.
To me, this looks like another example of grade inflation.
Personally, I thought the NAD course was superb! It's not long, but it was what I had envisioned as the quintessential Northwest course.
To me, this looks like another example of grade inflation.
Personally, I thought the NAD course was superb! It's not long, but it was what I had envisioned as the quintessential Northwest course.