Supination and pronation can happen in waves as much as the backswing/forward-swing can. So you can pronate more on the backswing (James Proctor) and have a longer/larger turn the key move. You can also have a smaller mover and both supinate into the hit and then pronate out of the hit. The...
I think you’ve got to mess with a super flippy disc on that high of a launch. Distance lines are typically throwing very high with something that’ll turn like crazy to carry the nose down and make use of gravity on the tail end.
I’m gonna play with the simulator now too.
It’s definitely a workable cue. I think about golfers hitting that tiny ball with a tiny club head and pronating their hands or tennis players on a serve pronating and being able to hit a line on demand at 130mph. The human body is capable of learning how to time movements like this in other...
Regarding nose up:
I’ve basically found the opposite of what @disc-golf-neil showed for nose down experiments works for creating nose up angles.
Three ways I’ve seen to manipulate it:
1. Swoop (aka air bounce)
2. Pronate the arm into the hit. It may also be helpful to move the thumb deeper...
I prefer the innocent until proven guilty mindset personally as that’s how I would prefer to be treated.
A $100 Cadillac is a far cry from what OT is doing when putting out free content and selling discs/merchandise at retail value. Comparatively that would be closer to OT charging $15,000 for...
In terms of “proof” the video proves that with the one person in the video the cue did work (assuming tech disc is accurate).
Fair enough. That’s kind of what a coach does. They test the cue with multiple people and see if it works. One that works more often for more people is more of a “go to”...
Because they have additional content behind a paywall, the motivation behind their free content must be to make money and therefore they don’t care about results of their students?
This is circular reasoning. You’re basically saying, “because they make money elsewhere their intention is to...
Good question. Not at all. I’m against assuming the motivations of someone posting content on the basis of it producing a lucrative revenue stream.
If Sheep and Sewer Bill were questioning the motivations instead of assuming them the conversation would be much different at this point.
You’re mad their goal is to sell stuff on their store page?
My biggest issue with your argument is your assumption that because they make money, whatever the amount, they don’t care about getting results for their students. If they made $100,000 monthly it still wouldn’t prove your point...
To clarify, I didn’t equate tech disc with biomechanics. The point I was making was that the cue from the video of “flip the disc” was proven to work by tech disc data. If you don’t believe tech disc to be accurate then that is obviously insufficient proof.
Now this is interesting and depends...
Contextually Overthrow at a minimum is being wrapped up in all this. I’m sure there is no need for me to quote the very beginning of the thread to prove that as well as Sheep’s later info to prove that they are bundled into the accusations. This whole post was created as a hit piece against...
I think you are very wise and I appreciate your measured responses.
Regrettably, my first interactions on here were fighting pseudo-logic with logical proofs. I felt a heavy hand was necessary in light of magnanimously ignorant and spiteful comments. Understandably, others will see my method...