I don't think course should have its ceiling lowered only because its on a small piece of land. That should be considered an uncontrollable.
I know there may be some NASCAR fans out there. Would the same logic be applied to the Bristol Motor Speedway? Would it not be considered top notch because it is only a half mile track?
A course of any size could get a 5 star rating.
Radcliff could easily be a 5 star course. There are a couple factors that keep it from it. Mostly due to the close proximity of non disc golfer using the park.
This is where you and I disagree. Radcliff is a fine course and I've played it many times. The designers did a great job with what I would call a smaller-than-average plot of land on which to build a disc golf course. But I can't imagine any possibly way that Radcliff could ever deserve the same rating I gave Idlewild (5*).
Last edited: