I do not like this idea, at least not that 935 limit. There are top and low end exceptions, but what I see out of most advanced players are more rounds in the 940-970 but with enough 890-910 to bring that rating down. This is doubly more important if it is a difficult course where a few bad putts and maybe a little bad luck can suddenly turn an others good weekend in a poorly rated one.
Case in point; this past weekend I threw out a 956 round which was near my normal ability. I would say that would mean I was competitive, not near the top (off the lead by 7 throws), but still very competitive. The second round I was clipped by 2 OBs, 2 bad putts, and one hole that completely destroyed me. It was a bad round as I pulled in a sub 900 round, but in the grand scheme of things I played really well for 24 of those 27 holes. If I could have cleaned up just a few mistakes, saving just a few throws, I easily could have gotten that rating back up into the 940s.
Point being is that it does not take much to drag someone down into the 930s and 920s. If you still want a rating that people can strive for, to make it look like they are being rewarded with an invite, I am thinking that maybe a 925 would be a better number. That will accommodate a player who is normally deserving a berth but might have had a bad round due to a small handful of holes blowing up in their face.
Obviously everyone is going to have a bad hole here and there, and the higher ranked players are able to spread them further between tournaments rounds, keeping that rating up, but remember we are talking about advanced players here, not open. I see a huge difference in abilities between a 930 and a 910 rated player, but not between 930 and 940; that is why I think a 925 would be a better compromise...
DISCLAIMER: ...says the 933 rated player who does not want to be on the outside looking in at future Am Worlds.