I know you said "random" site, but if the Ascent is a Teebird/Eagle which are both speed 7, why would it be a speed 10? The other numbers make sense.
Eagle - 7
Dragon - 8
Valk - 9
Beast - 10
Wraith - 11
Destroyer - 12
Boss - 13
Doesn't the speed number correspond to the year in which a disc was made, for example you just take the year the disc was first put out and add 5 or something like that? It doesn't work perfectly, but hey, how can any system be perfect? The Boss (speed 13) is almost twice as fast as the Eagle (speed 7), right?
Using this logic, putting the Ascent at a speed of 10 makes sense. If it had been released in 2007, it would be a speed of 7. That is why we are waiting until Spring to release our next driver, we want it to go to 11.
Serioulsy though, the Ascents rating numbers are:
Speed 56 / 460
Fade 15
Turn 4
-----------
Two notes:
1. We are tweaking the bottom speed number, changing it from a multiplier to the distance in feet it is designed to fly.
2. For comparison, the Ridges speed numbers are now 52 / 300 while the VPs speed numbers are 60 / 250
-----------
Another issue that is arising is that we mold the ratings into the disc and depending on what type of material, the discs should have different ratings. I'm not sure of the most practical solution for this. The numbers above are for the X-Link material. The X-Link Firm seems to need less speed (probably right around 52 or so, right where the Ridge is). This is a problem with our current ratings on the disc and it is something I'd like to solve long term.