I agree thats what the other poster point was most likely. I would also concede that it would make certain aspects less inclusive, but i wouldnt generalize that into the whole sport is now less inclusive because of how tournaments are ran and how private courses operate.While I would like disc golf to become more recognized so that it's easier to explain what I'm doing and so less people decide to picnic under baskets and on tees. I don't know that I want more private courses, dress codes in tournaments, and the like.
I believe what the point the poster you quoted was trying to make was: the more recognized disc golf becomes and the more players it attracts the more crowded the local courses will be. Therefore you'll have to pay to play the good courses and you won't be able to just go play a couple quick rounds with your buddies on a Saturday at the decent local course.
Also all of these things sound like golf (ball) elitism/snobbery stereotypes. I don't think disc golf needs to be a country club sport. If it evolves into one whatever I'll still play but I don't see anything wrong with disc golf taken seriously as it is now without (ahem partaking in any illicit substances)
I mean taken seriously by a player. I don't need a dress code or pay to play courses to try to play my best in a league round, a casual round, or a tournament round.
I think those things make disc golf less inclusive.
Overcrowding on public courses is a blessing and a curse. But the overcrowding has nothing to do with the 1% of the 1% of golfers who choose to play tourneys, competetive leagues, or on private courses.
Its simply that the sport is growing. So i dont see an argument for how disc golf essentially getting more organized and commercial will further be a problem. Its already a problem, and its not necessarily a bad thing. It could in a lot of areas get the city or parks dept to look into more courses to meet the demand. It will bring business to not only disc golf related businesses but other local eateries, hotels, gas stations, etc.
Cities will take notice, or maybe youll have to show them but either way, its a step in a necessary direction for the growth of disc golf. Outside of private land, cities will have to be on board in some way or another, be it for permission, land, funding, labor, or all of those, youre going to have to go thru someone if its not private.
So what this all summizes to is, disc golf is growing at a rate that is hard to control based on even the record number of courses going in the last few years. Its still hard to accomodate this growing thing.
It is inevitable that some places will need to adress this by one of a few ways. They can install a new course(s), or take the courses out for safety reasons of the other park goers (more of a possibility than some may think).
So, if you dont want the latter to be an actual possibility, you need to help make that choice harder for you cities by not giving them the impression that disc golf is negative.
The private courses, dress codes for tournaments, smoking and alcohol bans during tourneys, etc are all inevitabilities, whether people like them or not. So i wont debate those anymore simply because the people they offend are not going to be affected by it really.
In this economy, cities will need justification to put in new courses. So dont give them a reason to not help disc golf grow.
Good marketing, sponsors and their money, more organization and unification amongst the pdga, bigger clubs, and smaller clubs, better events with more attractive prize pools. All of this will grow the competetive side of the sport, while simultaniously stimulating the casual side of the sport and it will create a marketing and revenue circle that would help sustain disc golf while taking it to a higher level.