tenaciousg
Bogey Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 65
Ah the old MVP switcheroo!
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
this topic is way above DGCR discussion
This isn't based in science what so ever, but my line of thought would be to make the core and overmold the same weight. I'm not sure if that's even possible, but it seems the disc would fly more traditionally if it was equally weighted in the core and rim.
this topic is way above DGCR discussion IMO understand gyroscopic principles alone is no easy thing to do. Gyro would not defeat the purpose of a massive OS disc. Look at a boomerang which is extremely gyroscopic and so stable they fade BACK TO YOU when thrown lol... Gyro essentially exaggerates the flight of a disc as it keeps the core wanting to move in one direction or the other.
found a good read here a while back when researching mvp gyro and how it could/would/should impact disc flight. http://plus.maths.org/content/os/issue7/features/gyroscopes/index
Just playing Devil's Advocate here but Aerobies are all wing.That idea to me would accomplish the opposite effect. Or at the very least something thats not really what Im after.
Basically, think of how a cheap beach frisbee flies. The weight is pretty evenly distributed, pretty uniform thickness, only think that maintains any sorta flight there is the folded down portion of the lip/wing. They cant take any torque because the outside of the disc wont stabalize that well if it ever gets off plane.
Youd need to (in my relatively uneducated opinion) have as mich weight as possible in the wing and also have a relatively small "top" portion of the mold. Think spirit/flick/Nuke OS, all wing, no top, massively OS.
Just playing Devil's Advocate here but Aerobies are all wing.
Pwingles, I think the new shocks offer a lot of what you are seeking.
It is a disc that I can throw flat with 400' of power into a headwind and it will go straight then fade hard.
Anytime I throw it flat it shows an ability to penetrate straight then fade hard. Thrown with any hyzer and it acts very OS and piggish.
I think if you tried one you would not be doubting their ability to make something like you describe.
Either eay I'm really pumped to put these up against my Zones and FR vectors.
Please stop talking.
Boomerangs are the opposite of gyroscopic. They dont "fade" anywhere.
And yes, the way they use the gyro traditionally for MVP would hinder any attempt at a meathook type mold.
Meathook molds are glideless and fade very hard.
Gyro, keeps your disc on a line. This isnt rocket science dude, i know youre a fanboi and everything but if that concept doesnt make sense to you then idk what to say.
How neutral/US is the tangent flying for you guys?
Tensor vs Vector
That wing looks really aerodynamic and wide for a mid...I'm betting this is going to be kind of a fast mid/slow fairway driver tweener. Maybe like a wide diameter Whippet? Ram? I'm not a big advocate of overstable mids, but that profile looks fast and if it glides at all it's going to be near fairway distance for me. I would love a slower Shock, and that is what I'm predicting here.
I was looking at the first image...Looks more like a wide diameter Zone.