[Innova] Roc3x midrange

[myllys]

Those of you that need more overstability should try the Millennium Taurus. They're penned RX and fly really overstable.

 

[SD86]

Update: taking my Ti Buzzz out of the bag and trying the Star RocX3 in its place. My Ti Buzzz is relatively stable for a Buzzz, but I thought I'd see if the RocX3 and a bit more reliable fade will work better for me.

 

[Keller]

Well, isn't that special

 

[Horsman]

Those of you that need more overstability should try the Millennium Taurus. They're penned RX and fly really overstable.

I wouldnt say that the Taurus is really overstable. They are OS but they are not a gator or justice.

 

[ODRB]

I wouldnt say that the Taurus is really overstable. They are OS but they are not a gator or justice.

Agree. Not a Gator or Zone or Harp or Justice. But it is a significantly more OS Rancho Roc, even as compared to the usual "beefy" Ranchos like 2004 and 2006 Champs and Kenny 4x.

For anyone that has always wanted a more OS Rancho Roc, and has carried around a Gator or whatever else because they couldn't find a really OS Roc, the Taurus fits the bill. Not a meathook. But significantly more OS than any Rancho Roc you own.

 

[Keller]

How does the Taurus or Rocx3 compare to a Star Rancho Roc?

 

[myllys]

The Taurus is more overstable than the RocX3 though, IMHO.

 

[ODRB]

The Taurus is more overstable than the RocX3 though, IMHO.

Yes. And more OS than a Star Rancho.

 

[myllys]

The Taurus also feels much better in the hand for me. With limited experience, the Star Rancho felt a bit bulky and a bit floppy in a way whereas the RocX3 felt plussy and awkward to grip.

 

[Alexplz]

Yes. And more OS than a Star Rancho.

Whew that sounds pretty OS. Star Ranchos to me seemed needlessly OS when I would prefer to just bag some kind of specialty OS mid for trick shots alongside ranchos.

 

[ODRB]

Whew that sounds pretty OS. Star Ranchos to me seemed needlessly OS when I would prefer to just bag some kind of specialty OS mid for trick shots alongside ranchos.

he only Star Ranchos that I;ve thought to be really OS are the '01 remakes--all gummy and flat.

 

[Alexplz]

he only Star Ranchos that I;ve thought to be really OS are the '01 remakes--all gummy and flat.

Mine has a massive dome, max weight production stiff star from a couple years ago. Flies slowwww and OS like I'm throwing a sesame seed hamburger bun. :|

 

[ODRB]

That sounds gross. Why would you buy that?

 

[Alexplz]

That sounds gross. Why would you buy that?

I bought it when I was just starting out - the shop was out of KC so I figured hey, Star must be even better, right?

 

[SD86]

Question: has anyone thrown both the Champion and Star RocX3s and can compare their flights and stabilities? TIA.

 

[SD86]

Update: taking my Ti Buzzz out of the bag and trying the Star RocX3 in its place. My Ti Buzzz is relatively stable for a Buzzz, but I thought I'd see if the RocX3 and a bit more reliable fade will work better for me.

Didn't work out so well. I put the Buzzz back in the bag. The RocX3 is not very overstable, didn't do so well un the wind.

 

[dekdo]

Question: has anyone thrown both the Champion and Star RocX3s and can compare their flights and stabilities? TIA.

wondering this myself

 

[Baseballadp]

Anybody know how much more or less OS the rocx3 is compared to a mf roc3

 

[moorent]

Rocx3 wasn't as overstable as I wanted.

I bought a first run taurus and am much happier.

That is all.

 

[ILUVSMGS18]

Anybody know how much more or less OS the rocx3 is compared to a mf roc3

It's a little more OS than a flat Star Roc3. I found that a Z Wasp worked better for me, but I'd like to get a Taurus and see if it is more of what I'd like.