Recent content by BogeyNoMore

Good point

I think I'm with you on this. One person doing it is good fun, but if a lot of people doi it, it'd get old and quick. Spiderman on hole 4. Harry Potter on 12. Gandalf on 18.

I posted that in the Explanation of the physics of flying discs thread. https://www.dgcoursereview.com/threads/explanation-of-the-physics-of-flying-discs-fixed.25803/page-11#post-4250883

Some very basic info.

Just my personal opinion... Many DGCR reviewers (and I'm guilty of it myself), provide too much detail, resulting reviews that feel more like essays. Maybe it's partly an effort to not write a U-Disc type review, but it can be hard to glean what you want from long reviews. Lengthy reviews...

I scan them to see if the they actually tell me something about the course and how it plays. As Pastor of Muppets said, some reviewers have a default format that makes it easier to find the what you want to know. I really appreciate that.

...and a total of 7 of the Top 10.

Had no idea you were an entomology bug. You think you know a person...

It'll be interesting to see how Salonen handles tomorrow with Kristin just 2 strokes behind her. I suppose it'll be hard for anyone to catch her if she cards eight birdies again, six of them coming on successive holes (#'s 9 -14). That's a helluva streak.

Oh, how I wish I could say that.

That's pretty much how I feel. But I think the OP was getting at, "How scratched up and/or wet does a card mate have to get, to satisfy the requirements of help ing to find a lost disc? I'd say no rules can force a card mate to get cut on thorns or hump through wet bushes. They can scan...

Trying to entice people to upgrade their subscription.

Mother nature telling DGPT, "I got your planned schedule right here!" *crotch grab*

Great job losing that baby weight. Not even a hint you were ever pregnant! 🤪

...but I'm glad he's prioritizing his family.