What would you pick given the choice? Blizzard plastic or 150class?
or do you use a completely different disc for Max Distance?
or do you use a completely different disc for Max Distance?
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
What would you pick given the choice? Blizzard plastic or 150class?
or do you use a completely different disc for Max Distance?
Right now, though, the two longest discs in my arsenal area 153g Blizz Boss and a 170 domey star katana. The two are duking it out to see which one will lead me to break 550'.
Yeah I was wondering what is easiest to just rip.. I guess Im still kinda wondering.. Wasnt a fan of my 134g Blizzard Wraith.. Not a fan of the regular Katana.. Was gonna try out a blizzard boss
What would you pick given the choice? Blizzard plastic or 150class?
or do you use a completely different disc for Max Distance?
Just clarifying: isn't Blizzard plastic all 150 class? 150 class, as I understand it, is anything less than 160g.
That said, I REALLY like ripping on 150 leopards and teebirds. They absolutely sore. You almost have to stand over them on the angle of release, but they cook.
Right now, though, the two longest discs in my arsenal area 153g Blizz Boss and a 170 domey star katana. The two are duking it out to see which one will lead me to break 550'.
Oh no contest, the Blizzards. They have added almost 50' to my drives at times. I am getting home in 2 on holes I used to have trouble getting home in 3.
I haven't touched a Blizzard disc. Since I throw 175 g and up, something about taking 20% off of that doesn't agree with me. It might have something to do with the fact that I started throwing 175 g ultimate discs when I was 10 or 11. I understand the point, and I think that the idea of lower-weight discs that retain flight characteristics is wonderful for younger players or new players (in fact, I think a set of Blizzard discs would be great for introducing the high school girls I teach to the wonder of disc golf). But I also think that the technology may get to the point of being ridiculous after a time.
Alas, for me, neither. But that's mostly because I haven't tried.
I haven't touched a Blizzard disc. Since I throw 175 g and up, something about taking 20% off of that doesn't agree with me. It might have something to do with the fact that I started throwing 175 g ultimate discs when I was 10 or 11. I understand the point, and I think that the idea of lower-weight discs that retain flight characteristics is wonderful for younger players or new players (in fact, I think a set of Blizzard discs would be great for introducing the high school girls I teach to the wonder of disc golf). But I also think that the technology may get to the point of being ridiculous after a time.
Alas, for me, neither. But that's mostly because I haven't tried.