• Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
    It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)

[Other] Expensive for the sake of being expensive

I have a pink glow Oak Grove firebird, looks and flies exactly like my Sexton.

Good to know, I have a glow Sexybird and just picked up a pink and green glow Firebird a couple of weeks ago from a local tournament. Was curious if they where the same.
 
This is exactly what is keeping me from throwing a lot of Legacy. I can't seem to find Patriots in my 170 range, and good luck finding rivals in the Mid 160s.

I have to check my lot of Pat's. I have one at 169g I know of. All the rest are 172-175.

Rivals I have an Icon at 165 and a Pinnacle at 168.
 
I have a Mcpro Roc3 that I bought for about $15. I have not gotten around to throwing it, so when I saw the same run selling for north of $35 on eBay, I am really tempted to sell mine. I don't understand this. Sure the proshop does not have them up now but will in a couple of months and they will be only $17 if you figure in shipping.
 
I like fancy discs. If I have to pay a little bit more to have a run I enjoy the feel/flight/look/durability of, I surely will. I've been buying and destroying expensive pairs of skis/boots/bindings for years. $30-$40 for a disc that will likely last me over a decade just doesn't seem like a huge deal. Not that I don't throw all sorts of stock discs too, I just won't let an extra $10-$30 stop me from getting exactly what I want. I guess it comes down to what you're willing to spend disposable income on and how you justify that spending to yourself.
 
Those self-righteous stock-price-only throwers have obviously never taken a shower with a pearly, board-flat, semi-gummy 2004 USDGC Ring of Rocs Rancho Roc.

This might be the most disc golfest post ever. Well done, David. :thmbup:
 
This is like solving how many licks will it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop.

tumblr_mx9dh3nWWk1t55xupo1_400.gif
 
I think that expensive discs can make you a better player. :cool:

1. you wont change discs as often as "regular discs" = more accuracy
2. you will not loose discs as often, because you will search harder;)
3. In the long run, it could make you money (there is always a need for "rare" discs)


IMHO people are irrrational, so the price of the disc is sometimes far away from its value, and that is great for business.:)
 
Last edited:
If anyone can't figure out why you would spend a premium on discs then don't. Disc golf is my main hobby and throwing older discs makes me happy. Do 11x gazelles make me a better player? NO! But I started discing in the 10x era and have been throwing them ever since and enjoy the way they fly. I think some people feel super righteous for "ONLY EVER" paying stock prices. How others spend their discing dollar shouldn't effect someone else.

I think there's a difference between spending 40 dollars on a thrower than 100+ on a swirly Roc to stick in a plastic bag. I understand both, but they are different things. I won't tell someone who spends 100 on a collectors disc that they are crazy. Just as much as I don't need them to tell me I'm a self righteous newb for wanting to pay whatever it is that I want to spend.
 
I stick to regular runs. Then, when I need a replacement, I just pay the bare minimum. If the disc gets changed, then I adapt my game. Or there a plenty of disc options out there that won't cost me $50 a pop.

However, I can see how certain people have developed a strong relationship with a certain run. I can say with confidence that a Boss gets me longer and more consistent distance than any other disc. If I lost the ability to have that specific disc in my bag, I'd be upset as my distance and confidence would suffer.
 
^ Confidence. You think you play better so you DO play better. It has nothing to do with the disc.
 
^ Confidence. You think you play better so you DO play better. It has nothing to do with the disc.
Certainly applies to my putting game. If I know its going in, it does. Any hesitation and the results are not pretty.
 
I think there's a difference between spending 40 dollars on a thrower than 100+ on a swirly Roc to stick in a plastic bag. I understand both, but they are different things. I won't tell someone who spends 100 on a collectors disc that they are crazy. Just as much as I don't need them to tell me I'm a self righteous newb for wanting to pay whatever it is that I want to spend.


I agree here. I do spend a bit more for certain discs. The gazelles being a good example, but it is to throw. Anything that I have hung on my wall either has personal significance, is just a stamp I like, or is something I lucked out in the used bin.
 
Back in 2008 or so I started hoarding CE Leopards and 11X Teebirds because I wanted a good supply of backups. After I took a few years off and came back to the game, my attitude was pretty different. Do I really want to throw and potentially lose a $50+ disc? Not really. My new policy is that if I would be scared to throw the disc over water because of its value, I should just hang it or trade it.
 
Back in 2008 or so I started hoarding CE Leopards and 11X Teebirds because I wanted a good supply of backups. After I took a few years off and came back to the game, my attitude was pretty different. Do I really want to throw and potentially lose a $50+ disc? Not really. My new policy is that if I would be scared to throw the disc over water because of its value, I should just hang it or trade it.

That's a conundrum for certain. Sometimes I pick up a new disc (the Sexton Firebird for example) and love the way it flies. If I really like it, I may get a small stack for backups but when collectors will pay double the original asking price, it's really hard to throw them. I start thinking I could sell or trade to get stock-stamp backups or tourney fees paid for by parting with the collectible plastic.
 
Top