- Joined
- Feb 24, 2011
- Messages
- 5,743
that heavily woods play isnt even fun do yall really like hitting a tree on every drive and having fairways less than 20 feet wide not having the ability to save 3 on many holes
Real men play in the woods.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
that heavily woods play isnt even fun do yall really like hitting a tree on every drive and having fairways less than 20 feet wide not having the ability to save 3 on many holes
Make this a thread, and put your personal top choices as the voting options. Just a suggestion. You'll get a lot more eyes on it that way.
Rim width is 1.8 for both, but I'd have to say the Crave has more distance potential. If I'm throwing equally flat 175 10/10 Champ/Proton side by side the Crave is going farther.
Crave isnt slower than a teebird. The same
Teebird and Crave land within 3 feet of each other for me. The Crave flys straight to the target, whilst the Teebird has more lateral movement, both turn and fade.
The Crave is the longer of the two.
I'm not talking big difference in distance or some nonsense. But I stand by what I said..I'll film it if I have to. Both are awesome molds.
trace is a straight disc. like no joke straight. some turn and them some fade.
take a wraith, beat it up. you got a flip machine that will go.
plasma trace's have won me over. and i am considering dumping my photons for them.