Facts and common sense? What are they doing in this thread?
badminton is huge outside of this country, but some people can not think outside their neighborhood.
Decades ago, when I was a baseball coach, one of my friends and opposing coaches mentioned that he played competitive badminton. My reply was polite; my thought was, "Oh, my, how dainty, I'd never have thought." Then one day I walked into a gym where they were playing, and discovered it wasn't what I imagined, at all. They'd cut me to pieces if I tried to play.
This is, of course, old guy talk. When I talk to people who've never heard of disc golf, or people who've just started playing casually on the local course, they're amazed at its scope. Over 3,000 courses, over 600 tournaments, an event with a gallery and $8,000 to the winner, etc. It's a whole world they never imagined existed.
As I trudge through life I constantly discover that there are many whole worlds that I never knew existed. Sports and activities with national and international organizations, magazines, competitions they take very seriously, and all the rest.
Which is where all these Olympic sports that we ridicule come in. I was amazed at those badminton stats I quoted, but I'll bet most of those sports have similar support---and are much bigger deals, world-wide, than disc golf. Yet they're worlds we don't know about, at least not outside the Olympics.
While listing the sports that we feel are less deserving of Olympic inclusion than disc golf, it's also instructive to note how many sports are more deserving, yet not included. (I'm not an Olympics watcher and too lazy to research, but I think this includes baseball, softball, golf, cricket, rugby, a bunch of martial arts, a bunch of the "extreme sports", auto racing, and who knows how many others. Not to mention Ultimate, a much more viewer-friendly game.)
For myself, I'm not holding my breath for inclusion in the Olympics.