• Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
    It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)

dogs on leases

I had always thought of disc golfers as a loosey-goosey, tie-die-wearing, controlled-substance-partaking community. Quite a shock to find out what a bunch of rule-following sticklers we apparently are.

At least with regard to dogs and leashes . . . :D

wut

Shock? You've never td'ed a disc golf tourney have you?

-Dave
 
That's completely false. It might be true for your average house dog, but it's certainly not true for any well trained working dog. If that was the case they would be completely useless for hunting.

Well here's the problem. I don't know your dog. So I don't know if it's a "well trained working dog" or not. Nor do I care.

If you have no regard for social niceties toward me, I will reciprocate.
 
It's a hypothetical, I don't even own a dog. I just don't get all the butthurt over someone walking a well behaved dog off leash.

If my dog stays with me and doesn't bother you, why do you care if it's on a leash or not?
Congradulations. You just proved the point of the person you're debating.
 
dogs need to run
dogs love their owners
dogs need to run

leashes are for uncontrollable dogs.

go eat your law....my dog is off lease

nyah
 
dogs need to run
dogs love their owners
dogs need to run

leashes are for uncontrollable dogs.

go eat your law....my dog is off lease

nyah

Seeing how you are the admin and you brought it to this childish level, then I will step up to bat.

Should your dog offer threat to me or mine, I will use the necessary force to protect myself or mine. Then I will use civil law to recompensate myself for the trama of having to go though said actions. Don't be angry if this happens.

This has nothing to do with the law, but it has everything to do with simple common sense.

More proof of the tragedy of the commons. Let the dogs run free on you own property; there you have the rights to do as you please and I have no right to be present.
 
When a dog attacks, from my second hand experiences, it's usually deemed aggressive. Aggressive dogs are put to sleep. Does one really want to risk murdering their dog because one thinks it cruel to use a leash?!
 
Several parks have banned dogs altogether due to a-holes who think leash laws and rules about cleaning up after their dogs don't apply to them.

Don't be an a-hole and ruin things for the rest of us who can follow rules. No matter how well your dog minds you, you are still breaking a park rule if you allow your dog off leash. This alone can get all dogs banned from the park.

I currently have to drive an extra 3 miles past one park that has banned dogs to get to a park where I can walk him.
 
Couple of thoughts that haven't been covered.

First, if there are leash laws in the jurisdiction where you are playing, and the park is public, keep your dog on a leash for the sake of all of us. I've been playing disc golf for 16 years, much longer than most. There is a lot of time and effort that goes into getting a course established on public property. Unfortunately, many folks in the communities may not like disc golf and are looking for any reason to bring it before a city/county commission to have it removed. I'm serious when I say that allowing your dog to go without a leash, despite whether or not you think it is a "well behaved" dog, jeopardizes the course. That's just a fact. I can assure you that public courses have been pulled for much less than dog bites, and those of us who've been around for a while understand. If the course is on private land and the owner is cool with a dog, by all means. But in a public park, they need to be on a leash or at home.

Secondly, I am an insurance executive by trade. Currently, the largest claim my company is facing involves a vicious dog attack. There are about 15-20 breeds of dogs that are excluded from most homeowners insurance policies. An HO policy does cover your liability stemming from activities outside of your premises. This was one of the excluded types of dogs, however, the underwriter allowed the dog because it was a professionally-trained service dog. The owner took the dog to a park and sat down on a bench to read. A child, age 6, was walking her small dog, which was on a leash. The parents were only a few feet away, and they assumed a service dog was obedient. The service dog bit the small dog, killing it instantly, and in it's fervor curled the child into the fray as the leash was wrapped around the child's wrist. The service dog then continued to maul the child until the parents were able to wrestle the service dog off. The resulting damage was nearly 7 million dollars in medical bills and plastic surgery. The child did survive. The owner was an old rich guy with a huge Umbrella policy so he had enough insurance that the company is covering the entire claim. All that to say, dog attacks are a huge issue. Most people think they have coverage for their animals, but if you have a Pit bull, Rottweiler, Akita, German Shepherd, unless you have a specific endorsement on your policy, you don't have coverage in the event of that liability loss. And if you're a renter, I can guarantee you don't have enough liability coverage for any dog attack regardless of what type of dog. Bottom line, anytime you let the dog off the leash, you could be setting yourself up for HUGE financial ruin. On top of that, you could be sued for negligence and hit with punitive damages as well. It's not worth it, and I see these claims daily. Be smart.

Every once in a while we get some great info on this site. Thx zman
 
Several parks have banned dogs altogether due to a-holes who think leash laws and rules about cleaning up after their dogs don't apply to them.

Don't be an a-hole and ruin things for the rest of us who can follow rules. No matter how well your dog minds you, you are still breaking a park rule if you allow your dog off leash. This alone can get all dogs banned from the park.

I currently have to drive an extra 3 miles past one park that has banned dogs to get to a park where I can walk him.
And we're back to the crux of the issue, being courteous to others.
 
Seeing how you are the admin and you brought it to this childish level, then I will step up to bat.

Should your dog offer threat to me or mine, I will use the necessary force to protect myself or mine. Then I will use civil law to recompensate myself for the trama of having to go though said actions. Don't be angry if this happens.

This has nothing to do with the law, but it has everything to do with simple common sense.

More proof of the tragedy of the commons. Let the dogs run free on you own property; there you have the rights to do as you please and I have no right to be present.



ok, when my 5 lb dog does that, I won't hold you to blame.

:p

(props on the tragedy of the commons ref)
 
Which is correct:

A) lease
B) leach
C) leash
D) non of the above



"LEAF your effin pups always in pubic."

Either way, please foster or adapt a dog.

Think I'm just going to leaf this one alone.


Which is correct:

D) Nun of the abode.:D



FTFY. I also agree dogs should be adapted.
 
Top