Pros:
Some of the nicest, sturdiest-looking tee signs I've seen (not the cheap political ad kind pictured), and fancy blue-banded Discatchers that stand out nicely even at the longer distances involved on some holes. Two tees on every hole except 2 and 15; the tee signs clearly indicate which is which (and that there's only one on the holes that only have one). The blue tees add more distance, and sometimes also make the angle harder or add a tighter early gap. This allows the course to cater to a reasonably wide range of skill levels.
Some big par 4s; the only one that felt like a "three and a half" from the back tees was hole 4 - wish the pin was further back from the joint of the dogleg. All the others were red-blooded true par 4s; 18 could have passed for a short 5, especially given the odd tee gap.
Decent variety of hole shapes, without overt BH/FH favoritism. Only a few holes were truly open; most had some light tree guarding, typical of the city park style. What was atypical of city park courses was the elevation. Lots of that, including some big uphills. No really crazy fun downhill shots, but the hills are used so much that it hardly seems like a loss.
Cons:
Only three holes were truly wooded - 4, 5, and 7. So much for Woodland. None of these was a particularly remarkable technical play, either, although 7 has a silly tee gap that strongly encourages an overhand shot. 4, as mentioned above, played as a shot and a half kind of hole from the long tees (and a two half shot kind of hole from the shorts - 150 foot putter, 150 foot putter, with no way to really attack unless you have the power to go way over the top, in which case you probably shouldn't be playing the shorts).
Although the par 4s run up some distance, there were no long par 3s - hole 6 is the longest on paper, at 355', but plays closer to 300 effective feet due to the slope.
I hate to list turf tees under cons, but (a) it's turf over bare ground, so they're not all very level, and (b) concrete really is nicer on this bomby a course. They're also kinda short, though most have flat ground behind.
Other Thoughts:
Although the tees are labelled red and blue, they seem to correspond to upper novice to lower rec and intermediate, respectively, at least against the stated pars. Since par was marked the same for the shorts and the longs, there are a few par "4" holes from the shorts that just aren't: 3, 10, and 14 could all be long par 3s at the rec level or above, at least in my book.
Tee signs are oriented with north (I think) up instead of forward up - not a con, but odd.