- Joined
- Jul 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,316
I think going by the method mentioned above would result in more diversity in the top 10 without certain courses sitting at the top for years at a time.
That would be a good thing IMO.:thmbup:
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I think going by the method mentioned above would result in more diversity in the top 10 without certain courses sitting at the top for years at a time.
Claiborne is the most overrated course I've ever played.
The idea of limiting reviews to the last [insert time limit here] is one I've toyed with. It would only apply to courses that have been on the site for a certain amount of time while also having a certain amount of reviews. If there weren't at least 20 reviews in the last 2 years for a course (or whatever time limit), I'd take all the reviews that do meet that qualification and then just take the next most recent reviews to get to 20 or whatever number.
Someone earlier asked what the top 10 would look like if it was just reviews from the past year. On the annual top courses list, one of the lists is reviews just from the past year. It shakes things up a bit. I think going by the method mentioned above would result in more diversity in the top 10 without certain courses sitting at the top for years at a time.
Why don't you review the course and share your thoughts there? The sight is Disc Golf Course Review, not Disc Golf Message Board Course Review.
Qikly,
Claiborne is the most overrated course I've ever played. I think Doof's claim that it's easily better than Creekside is laughable. I'll never understand how a course with so little variety and at least two terrible holes can get over 4. But then again, lots of people complain about open holes. I tend to like the more open ones. So, there's that.
Thanks for your thoughts, PM. I'm super curious about this course. If it was two hours closer, I'd have already played it, but 5 hours each way is a hike, especially since I'd be making the drive alone.
Doof and I don't exactly see eye to eye on course design, based on what I've read of his reviews, but I do tend to like tighter quarters than what we often get in LA. Only one way to find out. I'm already thinking that I should try and hit Claiborne in Feb or Mar during Mardi Gras or spring break.
Play Claiborne then the real class of the area, Bistineau.
Yes. But Claiborne over Darbonne.From your comment you seem to prefer Bistinueau over Claiborne?
The idea of limiting reviews to the last [insert time limit here] is one I've toyed with. It would only apply to courses that have been on the site for a certain amount of time while also having a certain amount of reviews. If there weren't at least 20 reviews in the last 2 years for a course (or whatever time limit), I'd take all the reviews that do meet that qualification and then just take the next most recent reviews to get to 20 or whatever number.
Someone earlier asked what the top 10 would look like if it was just reviews from the past year. On the annual top courses list, one of the lists is reviews just from the past year. It shakes things up a bit. I think going by the method mentioned above would result in more diversity in the top 10 without certain courses sitting at the top for years at a time.
I also like the idea of an "annual" Top 10 list that only includes reviews from the past year.
Can you post the current results here on this thread so we can get an idea how different it is? Is it too much trouble to do both lists? Or maybe just release the annual list each January 1st? Whatever you decide to do, many thanks for all you do.
The idea of limiting reviews to the last [insert time limit here] is one I've toyed with. It would only apply to courses that have been on the site for a certain amount of time while also having a certain amount of reviews. If there weren't at least 20 reviews in the last 2 years for a course (or whatever time limit), I'd take all the reviews that do meet that qualification and then just take the next most recent reviews to get to 20 or whatever number.
Someone earlier asked what the top 10 would look like if it was just reviews from the past year. On the annual top courses list, one of the lists is reviews just from the past year. It shakes things up a bit. I think going by the method mentioned above would result in more diversity in the top 10 without certain courses sitting at the top for years at a time.
this shows top 100 at the end of each year and for the year in question. can change year at the bottom
http://www.dgcoursereview.com/topcourses/topcourses_2014.php
See the tab "2014 only"
(The default, when I clicked on the link above, was for "all reviews")
Doof and I don't exactly see eye to eye on course design, based on what I've read of his reviews, but I do tend to like tighter quarters than what we often get in LA. Only one way to find out. I'm already thinking that I should try and hit Claiborne in Feb or Mar during Mardi Gras or spring break.