slowplastic
* Ace Member *
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2014
- Messages
- 6,254
Yeah I disagree with that article too.
If someone throws 50mph and they want to get to 60+mph...it makes it sound like you should just throw Blizzies and do a 360. When in actuality you should put in the time to get through your current form plateau and you'll be throwing faster with the same or less effort. Getting into the correct body positions, and getting weight transfer (not just forward speed!) is distance, from what I have seen. Keep in mind I only throw ~400'...but I've definitely undergone lots of changes to get there and they certainly haven't been throwing sub 170g discs or running real fast!
Looking at one aspect of a pro's form (hey look they all run up!) and then saying that it's the main reason for their distance certainly isn't science. I appreciate the cool stats and the effort to put it together...but I get a bit upset having it sold as science.
If someone throws 50mph and they want to get to 60+mph...it makes it sound like you should just throw Blizzies and do a 360. When in actuality you should put in the time to get through your current form plateau and you'll be throwing faster with the same or less effort. Getting into the correct body positions, and getting weight transfer (not just forward speed!) is distance, from what I have seen. Keep in mind I only throw ~400'...but I've definitely undergone lots of changes to get there and they certainly haven't been throwing sub 170g discs or running real fast!
Looking at one aspect of a pro's form (hey look they all run up!) and then saying that it's the main reason for their distance certainly isn't science. I appreciate the cool stats and the effort to put it together...but I get a bit upset having it sold as science.