Pros:
1) This course is moderately to heavily wooded at times while never being too overly demanding or punishing for those who wish to play it safe.
2) Balances the line of mostly open but demanding line shaping on early holes and slowly tightens the width and increases the demand for accuracy as you progress through the front 9, then repeats the process on the back 9.
3) Several VERY soft par 4's (Hole #2 is a 393 ft single turn left to right hole through a wide tunnel of trees, Hole #3 is a 389 ft split gap left fairway or right fairway back to a peninsula green. Great looking hole, and would be a super challenging Par 3. Hole #5 and Hole #6 both right at 400 feet, both low ceiling righty hyzer holes through some narrow tree gaps intended to make these "two shot" par 4's. And they are, but very easy to birdie as long as you don't go crazy trying to get the eagle. Hole #10 is only 348 ft and wide open until the green which is protected by a ton of large trees and a very low ceiling as it's only defense. Hole #18 is 431 ft and plays down a wide open fairway around one tree to beat on the right to a wide open green. BUT for a park course intended for lower level skilled players, this is perfect. It's definitely a step up from a beginner course, has the ability to frustrate rec and intermediate players, and is still "fun" enough for the very skilled, especially if you play everything as a Par 3.
4) Two very distinct separate 9's. The front 9 is much easier and starts and finishes next to the main parking lot. Then you have a long walk across the road to Hole #10 for a much tighter wooded back 9 that adds a pond water hazard and more extreme shot angles.
5) Holes 12-14 and 16 add some difficulty with a pond that has to be thrown over once and around the rest of the time. Helps break up the similarity of some holes and definitely sets the course above the beginner level.
6) Very solid use of multiple angles and distances. If there is a putter turnover shot on one hole, you can bet you will see that shape again in mid or fairway driver distance form later for instance.
7) Solid use of elevation, although there isn't a ton on the course, the design uses the subtle rises and falls along with the tree cover well to increase difficultly and create demanding shot shapes and touch.
8) As stated previously, the difficulty progression from Hole to Hole prepares you and eases you into slightly more demanding shots with slightly more increased difficulty. Smart design and it allows you to hone in your gap hitting early without being too punishing before asking you to hit the super tight gaps later on.
9) Really fun short little track that can be played pretty quickly, our group of 4 played it in 58 minutes recently but we were trying to beat the rain that did catch us on Hole 17. I'd say a normal round for a group of 4 could be played in roughly an hour and a half at most.
10) Cute park with a full on replica Eiffel Tower. The front 9 is much more manicured and "park" esque in it's layout with the back 9 being much more of a "rural" woods course feel. Kind of the best of both worlds.
Cons:
1) This course is showing signs of it's age. Some of the tee pads are beginning to crack and become uneven, the course signage is outdated and dingy looking (though still has all the relevant info), the original lines are fading as trees have gotten much bigger and the underbrush is no longer kept cleaned up in spots.
2) The course lacks benches, bathrooms, water, and garbage cans (besides the one shelter house near the parking lot, which was locked when I last visited). This led to quite a bit of trash, mostly on the less well kept back 9.
3) There are a lot of blind tee shots (which isn't a bad thing from a difficulty perspective) but you will find yourself walking ahead quite a bit to locate pins and to see if the coast is clear (especially on the front 9 which has walking trails weaving throughout it).
4) The back 9 is "rough" and very thick off of the narrow fairways. Lost disc potential is great back there with the inclusion of the large pond. Keep an eye on everyone's shots.
5) Hole #12 is a particularly "bad" hole. You tee off through a gap of trees over the pond. Maybe only 100 feet of water that you are forced to carry. However, the first available landing zone is a 45 degree sloped bank maybe only 20 feet tall and 40 feet wide to try and land a disc on. The rest is a wall of trees. If you do manage to stick this spot, you have zero lines gaps or paths to the basket besides a wild spike hyzer back over the pond and around the trees. The 2nd landing zone is probably 250 feet of water carry and you have to crash through the tree to get back on land, and this spot is convienantly a picnic spot, maybe 30 feet in diameter with two picnic tables. This spot is blind from the tee and you are just hoping nobody is enjoying a snack by the pond if you try to land here. The third landing spot is the green. This requires a 375 ft water carry to a blind green, where you must crash through the trees and hope to hit a very small opening onto a walking trail to access the green. Then you are greeted with a basket raised probably 5 feet on a dirt mound. I'm completely certain that when this hole was designed, the tree cover was not this bad, the picnic area probably didn't exist, and there was a clear layout spot or go for the pin route. So not a bad hole initially, but a terrible one now.
6) No practice basket.
Other Thoughts:
The very first time I played this course (after about 8 weeks of playing disc golf) I absolutely loathed this course because of how blatantly it (at the time) appeared to favor the right hand backhand and punish the RHFH and LHBH. This was long before I learned how to shape a disc.
Now, years later, I appreciate the course and the challenge it provides. While even with brand new tee signs, repaired tee pads, benches, bathrooms, and all the bells and whistles this course would never reach 4 or 4.5 status, the course is good for what it is, and could improve the experience disc golfers get from playing here by updating/repairing a few problem areas. There are much better courses in the area, but Eiffel Tower is definitely worth a play when you come through, if not just for the photo next to the replica Eiffel Tower.